27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      In praise of outlaws

      Archaeological Dialogues
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ‘Outlaw’ is not a common category of archaeological thought but it is perhaps more useful than meets the eye. ‘Outlaws’ are typically viewed as contingent on legal and capitalist systems; they are, I suggest, also material, affective phenomena that draw our attention to how transgression, dissent and disorder are conceived through archaeological thinking. Here, I outline some ways in which ‘outlaw’ figures are ‘good to think with’, particularly for historical and colonial contexts but also for broader, more global frontier situations. Through three sketches of archetypal ‘outlaws’ in southern Africa's recent past, I consider where these disruptive figures draw attention to how mobility, violence, rebellion and state imagination (and the limits thereof) have been imagined through material misbehaviours.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          NEO-TRADITIONALISM AND THE LIMITS OF INVENTION IN BRITISH COLONIAL AFRICA

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Between trust and domination: social contracts between humans and animals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Livestock First Reached Southern Africa in Two Separate Events

              Karim Sadr (2015)
              After several decades of research on the subject, we now know when the first livestock reached southern Africa but the question of how they got there remains a contentious topic. Debate centres on whether they were brought with a large migration of Khoe-speakers who originated from East Africa; or whether the livestock were traded down-the-line among hunter-gatherer communities; or indeed whether there was a long history of diverse small scale population movements in this part of the world, one or more of which ‘infiltrated’ livestock into southern Africa. A new analysis of the distribution of stone toolkits from a sizeable sample of sub-equatorial African Later Stone Age sites, coupled with existing knowledge of the distribution of the earliest livestock remains and ceramics vessels, has allowed us to isolate two separate infiltration events that brought the first livestock into southern Africa just over 2000 years ago; one infiltration was along the Atlantic seaboard and another entered the middle reaches of the Limpopo River Basin. These findings agree well with the latest results of genetic research which together indicate that multiple, small-scale infiltrations probably were responsible for bringing the first livestock into southern Africa.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Archaeological Dialogues
                Arch. Dial.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1380-2038
                1478-2294
                December 2018
                November 06 2018
                December 2018
                : 25
                : 2
                : 105-133
                Article
                10.1017/S1380203818000168
                8ca6e35f-d370-4ddb-8ee1-8f470c7ddce9
                © 2018

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article