1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epigenetic aging in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls: preliminary findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cancer and its treatments may accelerate aging in survivors; however, research has not examined epigenetic markers of aging in longer term breast cancer survivors. This study examined whether older breast cancer survivors showed greater epigenetic aging than noncancer controls and whether epigenetic aging related to functional outcomes.

          Methods

          Nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors ( n = 89) enrolled prior to systemic therapy and frequency‐matched controls ( n = 101) ages 62 to 84 years provided two blood samples to derive epigenetic aging measures (Horvath, Extrinsic Epigenetic Age [EEA], PhenoAge, GrimAge, Dunedin Pace of Aging) and completed cognitive (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Cognitive Function) and physical (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form‐12) function assessments at approximately 24 to 36 and 60 months after enrollment. Mixed‐effects models tested survivor‐control differences in epigenetic aging, adjusting for age and comorbidities; models for functional outcomes also adjusted for racial group, site, and cognitive reserve.

          Results

          Survivors were 1.04 to 2.22 years biologically older than controls on Horvath, EEA, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE measures ( p = .001–.04) at approximately 24 to 36 months after enrollment. Survivors exposed to chemotherapy were 1.97 to 2.71 years older ( p = .001–.04), and among this group, an older EEA related to worse self‐reported cognition ( p = .047) relative to controls. An older epigenetic age related to worse physical function in all women ( p < .001–.01). Survivors and controls showed similar epigenetic aging over time, but Black survivors showed accelerated aging over time relative to non‐Hispanic White survivors.

          Conclusion

          Older breast cancer survivors, particularly those exposed to chemotherapy, showed greater epigenetic aging than controls that may relate to worse outcomes. If replicated, measurement of biological aging could complement geriatric assessments to guide cancer care for older women.

          Abstract

          Older breast cancer survivors were biologically older than matched noncancer controls across multiple epigenetic aging measures at 24 months or more after enrollment (which was presystemic therapy for survivors). Older breast cancer survivors who had received chemotherapy showed the greatest epigenetic aging, and among this group, an older epigenetic age was associated with worse self‐reported cognition relative to controls.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            (View ORCID Profile)
            Journal
            Cancer
            Cancer
            Wiley
            0008-543X
            1097-0142
            September 2023
            June 2023
            September 2023
            : 129
            : 17
            : 2741-2753
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
            [2 ] Norman Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles California USA
            [3 ] Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences University of California Los Angeles California USA
            [4 ] Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington DC USA
            [5 ] School of Aging Studies University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA
            [6 ] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
            [7 ] Department of Biostatistics Bioinformatics and Biomathematics Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington DC USA
            [8 ] Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
            [9 ] Moffitt Cancer Center University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA
            [10 ] John Theurer Cancer Center Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack New Jersey USA
            [11 ] Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis Indiana USA
            [12 ] Department of Psychiatry University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
            [13 ] City of Hope National Medical Center Los Angeles California USA
            Article
            10.1002/cncr.34818
            10659047
            37259669
            8c5a062c-9093-494f-9023-6e33f0691bd7
            © 2023

            http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article