35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comprehensive evaluation and prediction of groundwater quality and risk indices using quantitative approaches, multivariate analysis, and machine learning models: An exploratory study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Assessing and predicting quality of groundwater is crucial in managing groundwater availability effectively. In the current study, groundwater quality was thoroughly appraised using various indexing methods, including the drinking water quality index (DWQI), pollution index of heavy metals (HPI), pollution index (PI), metal index (MI), degree of contamination (C d), and risk indicators, like hazard quotient (HQ) and total hazard indicator (HI). The assessments were augmented through multivariate analytical techniques, models based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and integration of geographic information system (GIS) technology. The analysis measured physicochemical parameters across 48 groundwater wells from El-Menoufia region, revealing distinct water types influenced by ion exchange, rock-water interactions, and silicate weathering. Notably, the groundwater showed elevated levels of certain metals, particularly manganese (Mn) and lead (Pb), exceeding the drinking water limits. The DWQI deemed the bulk of the tested samples suitable for consumption, assigning them to the "good" category, whereas a small number were considered inferior quality. The HPI, MI, and C d indices indicated significant pollution in the central study region. The PI revealed that Pb, Mn, and Fe were significant contributors to water pollution, falling between classes IV (strongly affected) and V (seriously affected). HQ and HI analyses identified the central area of the study as particularly prone to metal contamination, signifying a high risk to children via oral and dermal routes and to adults through oral exposure alone (non-carcinogenic risk). The adults had no health risks due to dermal contact. Finally, the RNN simulation model effectively predicted the health and water quality indices in training and testing series. For instance, the RNN model excelled in predicting the DWQI, with three key parameters being crucial. The model demonstrated an excellent fit on the training set, achieving an R 2 of 1.00 with a very low root mean of squared error (RMSE) of 0.01. However, on the testing set, the model's performance slightly decreased, showing an R 2 of 0.96 and an RMSE of 2.73. Regarding HPI, the RNN model performed exceptionally well as the primary predictor, with R 2 values of 1.00 (RMSE = 0.01) and 0.93 (RMSE = 27.35) for the training and testing sets, respectively. This study provides a unique perspective for improving the integration of various techniques to gain a more comprehensive understanding of groundwater quality and its associated health risks, with a strong focus on feature selection strategies to enhance model accuracy and interpretability.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Water Quality Assessment using DWQI, HPI, PI, MI, Cd, HQ, and HI, along with advanced modeling techniques.

          • Wells reveal distinct water types influenced by ion exchange, rock-water interactions, and silicate weathering processes.

          • Elevated Metal Levels particularly manganese (Mn) and lead (Pb), exceeding drinking water limits.

          • Health Risks and Predictive Modeling due to metal exposure, with accurate predictions using RNN models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry.

              R J Gibbs (1970)
              On the basis of analytical chemical data for numerous rain, river, lake, and ocean samples, the three major mechanisms controlling world surface water chemistry can be defined as atmospheric precipitation, rock dominance, and the evaporation-crystallization process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                23 August 2024
                15 September 2024
                23 August 2024
                : 10
                : 17
                : e36606
                Affiliations
                [a ]Hydrogeology, Evaluation of Natural Resources Department, Environmental Studies and Research Institute, University of Sadat City, Minufiya, 32897, Egypt
                [b ]Scientific and Technical Research Center on Arid Regions (CRSTRA), Biskra, 07000, Algeria
                [c ]Non-conventional Water Resources Department Environment & Climate Changes Research Institute (ECRI), National Water Research Center (NWRC), Ministry of Water Resources & Irrigation (MWRI), El-Qanater El-Khairiya, 13621/5, Egypt
                [d ]Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Menoufia University, Shiben El Kom, Minufiya, 51123, Egypt
                [e ]Institute of Environmental Management, Faculty of Earth Science, University of Miskolc, 3515, Miskolc, Hungary
                [f ]Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 65211, Egypt
                [g ]Agricultural Engineering, Evaluation of Natural Resources Department, Environmental Studies and Research Institute, University of Sadat City, Minufiya, 32897, Egypt
                [h ]Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
                [i ]Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Bisha, Bisha, 61922, Saudi Arabia
                [j ]Materials Technologies and their Applications Lab, Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef City, Egypt
                [k ]Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, College of Science, Biology Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [l ]INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, E. Fermi 54, 00044, Frascati, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Institute of Environmental Management, Faculty of Earth Science, University of Miskolc, 3515, Miskolc, Hungary. mohamed.hemida@ 123456uni-miskolc.hu
                Article
                S2405-8440(24)12637-0 e36606
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36606
                11388788
                39263076
                8a46e4fa-0401-40ba-b31a-6f18a4da8ff1
                © 2024 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 7 April 2024
                : 19 August 2024
                : 19 August 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                human health risk,hydrogeochemistry,multivariate analysis,rnn,gis

                Comments

                Comment on this article