13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Shared latrines in Maputo, Mozambique: exploring emotional well-being and psychosocial stress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Approximately 18% of Sub-Saharan Africa’s urban population relies on shared sanitation facilities, which are shared by one or more households. While there is growing recognition of sanitation’s relationship with stress and well-being – particularly among women – most research has focused on rural populations and the transition from open defecation and/or unimproved latrines to private shared sanitation. This study explores sanitation-related stressors among users of both improved and unimproved shared sanitation facilities.

          Methods

          This study was nested within the larger MapSan health impact trial (Trial Registration: NCT02362932). Participants were recruited from the control arm of the trial (Traditional Latrine (TL) users) and intervention arm, which received one of two improved shared sanitation facilities – Shared Latrines (SL) shared by up to 20 individuals and Community Sanitation Blocks (CSBs) shared by more than 20 individuals. Sampling was informed by a life stage perspective to reflect diversity in sanitation needs and experiences within the population. Data included 96 in-depth interviews, 7 focus group discussions, and 25 unstructured observations. Data collection and analysis followed a Grounded Theory approach, which was used to identify the key domains of sanitation-related stress among participants. A semi-structured tool was applied to all female interview transcripts to assess the frequency and severity of key stressors.

          Results

          Participants reported stress due to: lack of safety; lack of privacy; disgust about the latrine condition; and collective action failure in terms of managing the latrine, often causing neighborhood conflict or unhygienic sanitation conditions. Fewer SL and CSB users reported specific stress domains and – with the exception of perceived safety – reported fewer severe stressors. The leading cause of stress reduction due to the intervention was decreased disgust followed by increased privacy and safety.

          Conclusions

          Our data suggest that “improved”, shared facilities can reduce stress when proper maintenance and management systems are in place. Private, shared sanitation only had limited impact on users’ perceptions of safety, particularly at night, suggesting that safety concerns extend beyond the physical latrine structure. Our research demonstrates that factors including latrine location and neighborhood violence are important determinants of safety perceptions and corresponding psychosocial stress.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants

          Stressors have a major influence upon mood, our sense of well-being, behavior, and health. Acute stress responses in young, healthy individuals may be adaptive and typically do not impose a health burden. However, if the threat is unremitting, particularly in older or unhealthy individuals, the long-term effects of stressors can damage health. The relationship between psychosocial stressors and disease is affected by the nature, number, and persistence of the stressors as well as by the individual's biological vulnerability (i.e., genetics, constitutional factors), psychosocial resources, and learned patterns of coping. Psychosocial interventions have proven useful for treating stress-related disorders and may influence the course of chronic diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: Understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators.

            Stress begins in the brain and affects the brain, as well as the rest of the body. Acute stress responses promote adaptation and survival via responses of neural, cardiovascular, autonomic, immune and metabolic systems. Chronic stress can promote and exacerbate pathophysiology through the same systems that are dysregulated. The burden of chronic stress and accompanying changes in personal behaviors (smoking, eating too much, drinking, poor quality sleep; otherwise referred to as "lifestyle") is called allostatic overload. Brain regions such as hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and amygdala respond to acute and chronic stress and show changes in morphology and chemistry that are largely reversible if the chronic stress lasts for weeks. However, it is not clear whether prolonged stress for many months or years may have irreversible effects on the brain. The adaptive plasticity of chronic stress involves many mediators, including glucocorticoids, excitatory amino acids, endogenous factors such as brain neurotrophic factor (BDNF), polysialated neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). The role of this stress-induced remodeling of neural circuitry is discussed in relation to psychiatric illnesses, as well as chronic stress and the concept of top-down regulation of cognitive, autonomic and neuroendocrine function. This concept leads to a different way of regarding more holistic manipulations, such as physical activity and social support as an important complement to pharmaceutical therapy in treatment of the common phenomenon of being "stressed out". Policies of government and the private sector play an important role in this top-down view of minimizing the burden of chronic stress and related lifestyle (i.e. allostatic overload).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Shared Cooperative Activity

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tess.shiras@gmail.com
                Oliver.Cumming@lshtm.ac.uk
                joe.brown@ce.gatech.edu
                bacelar@we-consult.info
                rassulmn@gmail.com
                Robert.Dreibelbis@lshtm.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Int Health Hum Rights
                BMC Int Health Hum Rights
                BMC International Health and Human Rights
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-698X
                25 July 2018
                25 July 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, GRID grid.21107.35, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, ; 615 Wolff Street, Baltimore, MD USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, GRID grid.8991.9, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, , Department of Disease Control, ; Kepple Street, London, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 4943, GRID grid.213917.f, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, , Georgia Institute of Technology, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [4 ]WE Consult, Water Supply and Mapping, 1013 Ave. Kwame Nkrumah, Maputo, Mozambique
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0457 1249, GRID grid.415752.0, Ministry of Health, ; Republic of Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9716-0419
                Article
                169
                10.1186/s12914-018-0169-z
                6060455
                30045729
                897d2055-9c2b-4f0a-90d0-26ab884a7f89
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 December 2017
                : 10 July 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (US)
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                sanitation,shared latrines,wash,psychosocial stress,stress,gender
                Health & Social care
                sanitation, shared latrines, wash, psychosocial stress, stress, gender

                Comments

                Comment on this article