2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is society caught up in a Death Spiral? Modeling societal demise and its reversal

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Just like an army of ants caught in an ant mill, individuals, groups and even whole societies are sometimes caught up in a Death Spiral, a vicious cycle of self-reinforcing dysfunctional behavior characterized by continuous flawed decision making, myopic single-minded focus on one (set of) solution(s), denial, distrust, micromanagement, dogmatic thinking and learned helplessness. We propose the term Death Spiral Effect to describe this difficult-to-break downward spiral of societal decline. Specifically, in the current theory-building review we aim to: (a) more clearly define and describe the Death Spiral Effect; (b) model the downward spiral of societal decline as well as an upward spiral; (c) describe how and why individuals, groups and even society at large might be caught up in a Death Spiral; and (d) offer a positive way forward in terms of evidence-based solutions to escape the Death Spiral Effect. Management theory hints on the occurrence of this phenomenon and offers turn-around leadership as solution. On a societal level strengthening of democracy may be important. Prior research indicates that historically, two key factors trigger this type of societal decline: rising inequalities creating an upper layer of elites and a lower layer of masses; and dwindling (access to) resources. Historical key markers of societal decline are a steep increase in inequalities, government overreach, over-integration (interdependencies in networks) and a rapidly decreasing trust in institutions and resulting collapse of legitimacy. Important issues that we aim to shed light on are the behavioral underpinnings of decline, as well as the question if and how societal decline can be reversed. We explore the extension of these theories from the company/organization level to the society level, and make use of insights from both micro-, meso-, and macro-level theories (e.g., Complex Adaptive Systems and collapsology, the study of the risks of collapse of industrial civilization) to explain this process of societal demise. Our review furthermore draws on theories such as Social Safety Theory, Conservation of Resources Theory, and management theories that describe the decline and fall of groups, companies and societies, as well as offer ways to reverse this trend.

          Related collections

          Most cited references224

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

          The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behaviour with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Human aggression.

              Research on human aggression has progressed to a point at which a unifying framework is needed. Major domain-limited theories of aggression include cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer theories. Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression. The review also organizes recent theories of the development and persistence of aggressive personality. Personality is conceptualized as a set of stable knowledge structures that individuals use to interpret events in their social world and to guide their behavior. In addition to organizing what is already known about human aggression, this review, using the GAM framework, also serves the heuristic function of suggesting what research is needed to fill in theoretical gaps and can be used to create and test interventions for reducing aggression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Sociol
                Front Sociol
                Front. Sociol.
                Frontiers in Sociology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-7775
                12 March 2024
                2024
                : 9
                : 1194597
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Organisation and Personnel Management, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [2] 2Department of Medicine, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                [3] 3Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                [4] 4Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Statistics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                [6] 6Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                [7] 7Department of History of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen , Groningen, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Todd L. Matthews, Sacred Heart University, United States

                Reviewed by: Annette Freyberg-Inan, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

                Laurens Buijs, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Michaéla C. Schippers, mschippers@ 123456rsm.nl
                Article
                10.3389/fsoc.2024.1194597
                10964949
                38533441
                891ecfc0-510c-4222-8cb0-2342819f28b2
                Copyright © 2024 Schippers, Ioannidis and Luijks.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 May 2023
                : 19 February 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 265, Pages: 22, Words: 20249
                Categories
                Sociology
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Sociological Theory

                death spiral effect,complex adaptive systems,societal collapse,income inequalities,dysfunctional behavior,elite and masses,turnaround leadership,strengthening of democracy

                Comments

                Comment on this article