4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Participant recruitment for paediatric research using social media: A practical ‘how‐to’ guide for researchers

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          Social media platforms are being increasingly used to support participant recruitment into paediatric health‐related research. This study aimed to develop a multi‐phase approach for using social media as a recruitment strategy for paediatric research studies.

          Methods

          The process was informed by the authors’ prior experiences recruiting for paediatric obesity‐related research studies, expertise in social media marketing and digital participant/ patient recruitment. Reflection on these experiences resulted in the iterative creation of a draft process which was further refined. A narrative literature review using a structured search was conducted to refine and augment the content and finalise the process.

          Results

          A six‐phase recruitment approach was developed that includes: (i) plan for social media use as a recruitment strategy, (ii) explore relevant ethical considerations to protect the wellbeing of potentially vulnerable groups and create an ethical management plan, (iii) identify and understand the different target audiences and develop the advertising strategy, (iv) develop and design campaign content, (v) implement, monitor and iteratively refine the recruitment campaign, (vi) evaluate the campaign success. Potential activities and key considerations relevant for paediatric research are presented within each phase.

          Conclusion

          Due to the widespread use and diverse characteristics of social media users, social media has the potential to disseminate details of research opportunities to community members who may otherwise not hear about, engage with, and potentially benefit from research participation. Researchers should collaborate with communication experts and target audiences to generate relevant and effective recruitment campaigns. Researchers should implement processes to protect vulnerable audiences’ wellbeing at each stage of the process. Recruitment via social media may support wider community participation in research studies designed to improve young people's health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic Review

            Background Social media is a popular online tool that allows users to communicate and exchange information. It allows digital content such as pictures, videos and websites to be shared, discussed, republished and endorsed by its users, their friends and businesses. Adverts can be posted and promoted to specific target audiences by demographics such as region, age or gender. Recruiting for health research is complex with strict requirement criteria imposed on the participants. Traditional research recruitment relies on flyers, newspaper adverts, radio and television broadcasts, letters, emails, website listings, and word of mouth. These methods are potentially poor at recruiting hard to reach demographics, can be slow and expensive. Recruitment via social media, in particular Facebook, may be faster and cheaper. Objective The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the current use and success of Facebook to recruit participants for health research purposes. Methods A literature review was completed in March 2017 in the English language using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, and a hand search of article references. Papers from the past 12 years were included and number of participants, recruitment period, number of impressions, cost per click or participant, and conversion rate extracted. Results A total of 35 studies were identified from the United States (n=22), Australia (n=9), Canada (n=2), Japan (n=1), and Germany (n=1) and appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. All focused on the feasibility of recruitment via Facebook, with some (n=10) also testing interventions, such as smoking cessation and depression reduction. Most recruited young age groups (16-24 years), with the remaining targeting specific demographics, for example, military veterans. Information from the 35 studies was analyzed with median values being 264 recruited participants, a 3-month recruitment period, 3.3 million impressions, cost per click of US $0.51, conversion rate of 4% (range 0.06-29.50), eligibility of 61% (range 17-100), and cost per participant of US $14.41. The studies showed success in penetrating hard to reach populations, finding the results representative of their control or comparison demographic, except for an over representation of young white women. Conclusions There is growing evidence to suggest that Facebook is a useful recruitment tool and its use, therefore, should be considered when implementing future health research. When compared with traditional recruitment methods (print, radio, television, and email), benefits include reduced costs, shorter recruitment periods, better representation, and improved participant selection in young and hard to reach demographics. It however, remains limited by Internet access and the over representation of young white women. Future studies should recruit across all ages and explore recruitment via other forms of social media.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Use of Social Media in Recruitment for Medical Research Studies: A Scoping Review

              Background Recruiting an adequate number of participants into medical research studies is challenging for many researchers. Over the past 10 years, the use of social media websites has increased in the general population. Consequently, social media websites are a new, powerful method for recruiting participants into such studies. Objective The objective was to answer the following questions: (1) Is the use of social media more effective at research participant recruitment than traditional methods? (2) Does social media recruit a sample of research participants comparable to that recruited via other methods? (3) Is social media more cost-effective at research participant recruitment than traditional methods? Methods Using the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases, all medical research studies that used social media and at least one other method for recruitment were identified. These studies were then categorized as either interventional studies or observational studies. For each study, the effectiveness of recruitment, demographic characteristics of the participants, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment using social media were evaluated and compared with that of the other methods used. The social media sites used in recruitment were identified, and if a study stated that the target population was “difficult to reach” as identified by the authors of the study, this was noted. Results Out of 30 studies, 12 found social media to be the most effective recruitment method, 15 did not, and 3 found social media to be equally effective as another recruitment method. Of the 12 studies that found social media to be the best recruitment method, 8 were observational studies while 4 were interventional studies. Of the 15 studies that did not find social media to be the best recruitment method, 7 were interventional studies while 8 were observational studies. In total, 8 studies stated that the target population was “hard-to-reach,” and 6 of these studies found social media to be the most effective recruitment method. Out of 14 studies that reported demographic data for participants, 2 studies found that social media recruited a sample comparable to that recruited via traditional methods and 12 did not. Out of 13 studies that reported cost-effectiveness, 5 studies found social media to be the most cost-effective recruitment method, 7 did not, and 1 study found social media equally cost-effective as compared with other methods. Conclusions Only 12 studies out of 30 found social media to be the most effective recruitment method. There is evidence that social media can be the best recruitment method for hard-to-reach populations and observational studies. With only 30 studies having compared recruitment through social media with other methods, more studies need to be done that report the effectiveness of recruitment for each strategy, demographics of participants recruited, and cost-effectiveness of each method.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sarah.lang@monash.edu
                Journal
                Nutr Diet
                Nutr Diet
                10.1111/(ISSN)1747-0080
                NDI
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1446-6368
                1747-0080
                08 May 2023
                September 2023
                : 80
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/ndi.v80.4 )
                : 338-350
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences Monash University Notting Hill Australia
                [ 2 ] School of Agriculture and Food Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne Parkville Australia
                [ 3 ] Opyl Ltd St Kilda Australia
                [ 4 ] Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School The University of Sydney Westmead Australia
                [ 5 ] The Children's Hospital at Westmead Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes Westmead Australia
                [ 6 ] School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Newcastle Australia
                [ 7 ] Food and Nutrition Research Program Hunter Medical Research Institute Rankin Park Australia
                [ 8 ] Weight Management Services The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead Australia
                [ 9 ] School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Sarah Lang, Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Be Active, Sleep, Eat (BASE) Facility, 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, VIC 3168 Australia.

                Email: sarah.lang@ 123456monash.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-1981
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8623-6174
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-1649
                Article
                NDI12810
                10.1111/1747-0080.12810
                10952907
                37154014
                8798ae80-e1f2-4549-8992-51923b177378
                © 2023 The Authors. Nutrition & Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Dietitians Australia.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 February 2023
                : 22 December 2022
                : 21 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 13, Words: 9960
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Government Research Training Program
                Funded by: Sydney Medical School Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100007811;
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Leadership (L3) Research Fellowship
                Award ID: APP2009340
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:20.03.2024

                adolescent,child,communications media,patient selection,social media

                Comments

                Comment on this article