12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incentivizing news consumption on social media platforms using large language models and realistic bot accounts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Polarization, misinformation, declining trust, and wavering support for democratic norms are pressing threats to the US Exposure to verified and balanced news may make citizens more resilient to these threats. This project examines how to enhance users’ exposure to and engagement with verified and ideologically balanced news in an ecologically valid setting. We rely on a 2-week long field experiment on 28,457 Twitter users. We created 28 bots utilizing GPT-2 that replied to users tweeting about sports, entertainment, or lifestyle with a contextual reply containing a URL to the topic-relevant section of a verified and ideologically balanced news organization and an encouragement to follow its Twitter account. To test differential effects by gender of the bots, the treated users were randomly assigned to receive responses by bots presented as female or male. We examine whether our intervention enhances the following of news media organizations, sharing and liking of news content (determined by our extensive list of news media outlets), tweeting about politics, and liking of political content (determined using our fine-tuned RoBERTa NLP transformer-based model). Although the treated users followed more news accounts and the users in the female bot treatment liked more news content than the control, these results were small in magnitude and confined to the already politically interested users, as indicated by their pretreatment tweeting about politics. In addition, the effects on liking and posting political content were uniformly null. These findings have implications for social media and news organizations and offer directions for pro-social computational interventions on platforms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies

          This paper proposes entropy balancing, a data preprocessing method to achieve covariate balance in observational studies with binary treatments. Entropy balancing relies on a maximum entropy reweighting scheme that calibrates unit weights so that the reweighted treatment and control group satisfy a potentially large set of prespecified balance conditions that incorporate information about known sample moments. Entropy balancing thereby exactly adjusts inequalities in representation with respect to the first, second, and possibly higher moments of the covariate distributions. These balance improvements can reduce model dependence for the subsequent estimation of treatment effects. The method assures that balance improves on all covariate moments included in the reweighting. It also obviates the need for continual balance checking and iterative searching over propensity score models that may stochastically balance the covariate moments. We demonstrate the use of entropy balancing with Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election

            The spread of fake news on social media became a public concern in the United States after the 2016 presidential election. We examined exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter and found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated. Only 1% of individuals accounted for 80% of fake news source exposures, and 0.1% accounted for nearly 80% of fake news sources shared. Individuals most likely to engage with fake news sources were conservative leaning, older, and highly engaged with political news. A cluster of fake news sources shared overlapping audiences on the extreme right, but for people across the political spectrum, most political news exposure still came from mainstream media outlets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PNAS Nexus
                PNAS Nexus
                pnasnexus
                PNAS Nexus
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2752-6542
                September 2024
                23 August 2024
                23 August 2024
                : 3
                : 9
                : pgae368
                Affiliations
                Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, USA
                Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
                GESIS—Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany
                Amsterdam School for Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Amsterdam School for Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Communication, University of California, Davis, USA
                Author notes
                To whom correspondence should be addressed: Email: mwojcieszak@ 123456ucdavis.edu

                A.C., M.H., and M.W. contributed equally to this work.

                Competing Interest: The authors declare no competing interest.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1325-9507
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-3937
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6976-9745
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-4414
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-4483
                Article
                pgae368
                10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae368
                11404517
                39285930
                8776f1a6-3c73-467a-a69e-3e39f20f8208
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 April 2024
                : 08 August 2024
                : 16 September 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Categories
                Social and Political Sciences
                AcademicSubjects/MED00010
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00010
                AcademicSubjects/SOC00010
                PNAS_Nexus/soc-sci

                social media,news engagement,bots,polarization,news avoidance

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content274

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors897