4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The dermatologists’ case for the bidet

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          What is known about this subject in regard to women and their families? There are several dermatological conditions that disproportionally affect the genital and perianal areas of women. Dry toilet paper and wet wipes can potentially aggravate these conditions. Toileting assistance is a major role of primary caregivers, and a majority of primary caregivers are women. Climate change is a health threat to women and their families. What is new from this article as messages for women and their families? Bidets are commonly used outside the Western world. Bidets can be recommended as an alternative to toilet paper or wet wipes in patients with perianal dermatological conditions. Bidets can increase toileting independence in those with disabilities. Bidets are more environmentally friendly than toilet paper. There are affordable, easy-to-install bidet options. Dear Editors, Introduction In this editorial, we contend that dermatologists should understand bidets and feel comfortable recommending their use. Primarily, they should be aware of the medical benefits they offer. Additionally, physicians should consider the environmental benefits as stewards of the environment. Finally, being aware of the commonality of bidet use outside of American culture can be considered part of a physician’s duty to cultural humility. Medical benefits Several dermatologic conditions affect the perianal region, including but not limited to eczema, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis, contact dermatitis, and lichen sclerosus. Due to the sensitive skin in the genital area, symptoms of diseases such as pruritus and burning can be more pronounced with toilet paper or irritant- or allergen-containing wet wipes. Using water to gently cleanse the area could alleviate the shortcomings of dry toilet paper and wet wipes. Bidets can also be useful for patients with a body habitus or disability that prevents them from independently cleaning after toileting. In a study performed with patients in a stroke rehabilitation unit, subjects who used an electric bidet had an increased quality of life by improving toileting independence and cleanliness after defecation. 1 Physicians can recommend the use of bidets as part of the symptomatic management of various diseases within the perianal region. Environmental benefits Climate change, biodiversity loss, and worsening natural disasters represent a threat to both the environmental and human health. Regardless of age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or geographical location, its negative health impacts are deleterious. Vulnerable populations such as children, elderly, minorities, and low socioeconomic status populations are disproportionately affected. The growing link between climate change and its impact on patients has led the medical community, including dermatologists, to address our role in the crisis. Several articles have been published in Journal of the American Medical Association Dermatology as well as the International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, emphasizing that major changes in climate have specifically affected dermatological diseases. 2–4 For these reasons, it is essential that medical professionals remain wellinformed about the climate crisis and invest in resources to prevent the exacerbation of health risks for our patients’ wellbeing. A sustainable resource that has the potential to have significant environmental benefits is the use of bidets. Toilet paper requires the use of 15 million trees to produce the 36 billion rolls of toilet paper Americans use annually. On average, it takes 36 gallons of water to produce a single roll of toilet paper. A bidet uses an estimated 1/8th of a gallon per use. 5 Moreover, bidets can be used indefinitely, thus reducing carbon emissions related to transport and packaging that toilet paper requires. Physicians can be assured that they are making an environmentally conscious recommendation. Conclusion In conclusion, bidets offer an alternative to toilet paper from a health, hygiene, and environmental standpoint. Bidet use is the predominant form of perianal hygiene in the Eastern world. Therefore, we hope that this editorial will serve to educate North American dermatologists on the benefits a bidet can provide to patients. Table 1 provides a brief description of the various types of bidets. Table 1 Information of common bidet styles Description Difficulty of installation Requires increased bathroom space Limitations of use Standalone A separate unit from the toilet, containing its own bowl and faucet. High Yes Requires patients to physically transfer from toilet seat to bidet. Handheld bidet/hose A separate handheld hose with a shower head like nozzle. Medium Maybe Patients who already strain to reach perianal area may have issues with directing nozzle to that region. Electric bidet attachment A bidet that attaches directly under the existing toilet seat. Low No Fixed positioning on the toilet may limit the area to be washed. Conflicts of interest Y. D.: Received 20 sample products intended for patient use from the bidet company, “TUSHY.” There are no conflicts of interest for the remaining authors. Funding None. Study approval N/A

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The influence of climate change on skin cancer incidence – A review of the evidence

          Background Climate change is broadly affecting human health, with grave concern that continued warming of the earth’s atmosphere will result is serious harm. Since the mid-20th century, skin cancer incidence rates have risen at an alarming rate worldwide. Objective This review examines the relationship between climate change and cutaneous carcinogenesis. Methods A literature review used the National Institutes of Health databases (PubMed and Medline), the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and International Agency for Research on Cancer registries, and published reports by federal and international agencies and consortia, including the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Climate and Clean Air Coalition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, and World Meteorological Organization. Results Skin cancer risk is determined by multiple factors, with exposure to ultraviolet radiation being the most important. Strong circumstantial evidence supports the hypothesis that factors related to climate change, including stratospheric ozone depletion, global warming, and ambient air pollution, have likely contributed to the increasing incidence of cutaneous malignancy globally and will continue to impose a negative on influence skin cancer incidence for many decades to come. Conclusion Because much of the data are based on animal studies and computer simulations, establishing a direct and definitive link remains challenging. More epidemiologic studies are needed to prove causality in skin cancer, but the evidence for overall harm to human health as a direct result of climate change is clear. Global action to mitigate these negative impacts to humans and the environment is imperative.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Adapting to the Effects of Climate Change in the Practice of Dermatology-A Call to Action.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Technology-assisted toilets: Improving independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation

              Background and Purpose Dependence on assistance for toileting is a widespread problem for persons receiving healthcare. Technology-assisted toilets, which hygienically wash and dry the perineal region, are devices that could improve toileting independence in a variety of patients. The objective was to investigate whether technology-assisted toilets improve toileting independence, quality of life, and whether technology-assisted toilets can provide sufficient toileting hygiene in stroke rehabilitation. Methods This pilot study was carried out in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Thirty participants were recruited. Participants had a bowel movement and cleaned themselves using the technology-assisted toilet on one to three occasions. Participants rated their toileting before using the technology-assisted toilet and after each technology-assisted toilet use with the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). After each session, participants were rated for cleanliness. Results PIADS scores were analyzed from eight individual participants, five of whom completed the full protocol. PIADS scores were significantly higher with the technology-assisted toilet than with the participants’ regular toileting routine (p < 0.05). Technology-assisted toilets cleaned effectively in 73% of cases (16/22, p < 0.05). Conclusion Technology-assisted toilets improved stroke patients’ psychosocial outcomes compared to standard toileting and completely cleaned participants in the majority of cases. A larger study should confirm technology-assisted toilet’s benefit in stroke rehabilitation through improved independence and hygiene.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Womens Dermatol
                Int J Womens Dermatol
                JW9
                International Journal of Women's Dermatology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2352-6475
                10 August 2023
                October 2023
                : 9
                : 3
                : e103
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Dermatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
                [b ] Department of Dermatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee
                Author notes
                * Corresponding author. E-mail address: ydalia@ 123456uthsc.edu (Y. Dalia).
                Article
                00016
                10.1097/JW9.0000000000000103
                10414710
                85f868d5-a730-41dc-bb73-9d9ca1be3bc5
                Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Women’s Dermatologic Society.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 June 2023
                : 06 July 2023
                Categories
                Editorial
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                UNITED STATES

                bidet,caregiver,climate change,hidradenitis,hygiene,perianal disease,public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article