8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Insight into Sulfur Confined in Ultramicroporous Carbon

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Here, we provide a deeper insight into the state of sulfur confined in ultramicroporous carbon (UMC) and clarify its electrochemical reaction mechanism with lithium by corroborating the results obtained using various experimental techniques, such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, in situ Raman spectroscopy, and in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. In combination, these results indicate that sulfur in UMC exists as linear polymeric sulfur rather than smaller allotropes. The electrochemical reactivity of lithium with sulfur confined in UMC (pore size ≤0.7 nm) is different from that of sulfur confined in microporous carbon (≤2 nm, or ultramicroporous carbon containing significant amount of micropores) and mesoporous carbon (>2 nm). The observed quasi-solid-state reaction of lithium with sulfur in UMC with a single voltage plateau during the discharge/charge process is due to the effective separation of solvent molecules from the active material. The size of carbon pores plays a vital role in determining the reaction path of lithium with sulfur confined in UMC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium-sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability.

          We report the synthesis of a graphene-sulfur composite material by wrapping poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) coated submicrometer sulfur particles with mildly oxidized graphene oxide sheets decorated by carbon black nanoparticles. The PEG and graphene coating layers are important to accommodating volume expansion of the coated sulfur particles during discharge, trapping soluble polysulfide intermediates, and rendering the sulfur particles electrically conducting. The resulting graphene-sulfur composite showed high and stable specific capacities up to ∼600 mAh/g over more than 100 cycles, representing a promising cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries with high energy density.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Challenges and prospects of lithium-sulfur batteries.

            Electrical energy storage is one of the most critical needs of 21st century society. Applications that depend on electrical energy storage include portable electronics, electric vehicles, and devices for renewable energy storage from solar and wind. Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries have the highest energy density among the rechargeable battery chemistries. As a result, Li-ion batteries have proven successful in the portable electronics market and will play a significant role in large-scale energy storage. Over the past two decades, Li-ion batteries based on insertion cathodes have reached a cathode capacity of ∼250 mA h g(-1) and an energy density of ∼800 W h kg(-1), which do not meet the requirement of ∼500 km between charges for all-electric vehicles. With a goal of increasing energy density, researchers are pursuing alternative cathode materials such as sulfur and O2 that can offer capacities that exceed those of conventional insertion cathodes, such as LiCoO2 and LiMn2O4, by an order of magnitude (>1500 mA h g(-1)). Sulfur, one of the most abundant elements on earth, is an electrochemically active material that can accept up to two electrons per atom at ∼2.1 V vs Li/Li(+). As a result, sulfur cathode materials have a high theoretical capacity of 1675 mA h g(-1), and lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have a theoretical energy density of ∼2600 W h kg(-1). Unlike conventional insertion cathode materials, sulfur undergoes a series of compositional and structural changes during cycling, which involve soluble polysulfides and insoluble sulfides. As a result, researchers have struggled with the maintenance of a stable electrode structure, full utilization of the active material, and sufficient cycle life with good system efficiency. Although researchers have made significant progress on rechargeable Li-S batteries in the last decade, these cycle life and efficiency problems prevent their use in commercial cells. To overcome these persistent problems, researchers will need new sulfur composite cathodes with favorable properties and performance and new Li-S cell configurations. In this Account, we first focus on the development of novel composite cathode materials including sulfur-carbon and sulfur-polymer composites, describing the design principles, structure and properties, and electrochemical performances of these new materials. We then cover new cell configurations with carbon interlayers and Li/dissolved polysulfide cells, emphasizing the potential of these approaches to advance capacity retention and system efficiency. Finally, we provide a brief survey of efficient electrolytes. The Account summarizes improvements that could bring Li-S technology closer to mass commercialization.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACS Omega
                ACS Omega
                ao
                acsodf
                ACS Omega
                American Chemical Society
                2470-1343
                17 September 2018
                30 September 2018
                : 3
                : 9
                : 11290-11299
                Affiliations
                []Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU) Electrochemical Energy Storage , Helmholtzstraße 11, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
                []Institute of Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, Ulm University , Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
                [§ ]Electron Microscopy Group of Materials Science, Central Facility for Electron Microscopy, Ulm University , Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
                []Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology , P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
                []Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg (ZSW) , Lise-Meitner-Straße 24, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]E-mail: helen.joseph@ 123456kit.edu (H.M.J.).
                [* ]E-mail: munnangi.reddy@ 123456kit.edu (M.A.R.).
                Article
                10.1021/acsomega.8b01681
                6645590
                85e90803-4e22-4ccf-96a6-0187e9c4ed3e
                Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

                This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

                History
                : 17 July 2018
                : 28 August 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ao8b01681
                ao-2018-01681h

                Comments

                Comment on this article