12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How well is the electronic health record supporting the clinical tasks of hospital physicians? A survey of physicians at three Norwegian hospitals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The electronic health record is expected to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. Many novel functionalities have been introduced in order to improve medical decision making and communication between health care personnel. There is however limited evidence on whether these new functionalities are useful. The aim of our study was to investigate how well the electronic health record system supports physicians in performing basic clinical tasks.

          Methods

          Physicians of three prominent Norwegian hospitals participated in the survey. They were asked, in an online questionnaire, how well the hospital’s electronic health record system DIPS supported 49 clinical tasks as well as how satisfied they were with the system in general, including the technical performance. Two hundred and eight of 402 physicians (52%) submitted a completely answered questionnaire.

          Results

          Seventy-two percent of the physicians had their work interrupted or delayed because the electronic health record hangs or crashes at least once a week, while 22% had experienced this problem daily. Fifty-three percent of the physicians indicated that the electronic health record is cumbersome to use and adds to their workload. The majority of physicians were satisfied with managing tests, e.g., requesting laboratory tests, reading test results and managing radiological investigations and electrocardiograms. Physicians were less satisfied with managing referrals. There was high satisfaction with some of the decision support functionalities available for prescribing drugs. This includes drug interaction alerts and drug allergy warnings, which are displayed automatically. However, physicians were less satisfied with other aspects of prescribing drugs, including getting an overview of the ongoing drug therapy.

          Conclusions

          In the survey physicians asked for improvements of certain electronic health record functionalities like medication, clinical workflow support including planning and better overviews. In addition, there is apparently a need to focus on system stability, number of logins, reliability and better instructions on available electronic health record features. Considerable development is needed in current electronic health record systems to improve usefulness and satisfaction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.

          This paper reviews the research literature on electronic health record (EHR) systems. The aim is to find out (1) how electronic health records are defined, (2) how the structure of these records is described, (3) in what contexts EHRs are used, (4) who has access to EHRs, (5) which data components of the EHRs are used and studied, (6) what is the purpose of research in this field, (7) what methods of data collection have been used in the studies reviewed and (8) what are the results of these studies. A systematic review was carried out of the research dealing with the content of EHRs. A literature search was conducted on four electronic databases: Pubmed/Medline, Cinalh, Eval and Cochrane. The concept of EHR comprised a wide range of information systems, from files compiled in single departments to longitudinal collections of patient data. Only very few papers offered descriptions of the structure of EHRs or the terminologies used. EHRs were used in primary, secondary and tertiary care. Data were recorded in EHRs by different groups of health care professionals. Secretarial staff also recorded data from dictation or nurses' or physicians' manual notes. Some information was also recorded by patients themselves; this information is validated by physicians. It is important that the needs and requirements of different users are taken into account in the future development of information systems. Several data components were documented in EHRs: daily charting, medication administration, physical assessment, admission nursing note, nursing care plan, referral, present complaint (e.g. symptoms), past medical history, life style, physical examination, diagnoses, tests, procedures, treatment, medication, discharge, history, diaries, problems, findings and immunization. In the future it will be necessary to incorporate different kinds of standardized instruments, electronic interviews and nursing documentation systems in EHR systems. The aspects of information quality most often explored in the studies reviewed were the completeness and accuracy of different data components. It has been shown in several studies that the use of an information system was conducive to more complete and accurate documentation by health care professionals. The quality of information is particularly important in patient care, but EHRs also provide important information for secondary purposes, such as health policy planning. Studies focusing on the content of EHRs are needed, especially studies of nursing documentation or patient self-documentation. One future research area is to compare the documentation of different health care professionals with the core information about EHRs which has been determined in national health projects. The challenge for ongoing national health record projects around the world is to take into account all the different types of EHRs and the needs and requirements of different health care professionals and consumers in the development of EHRs. A further challenge is the use of international terminologies in order to achieve semantic interoperability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Electronic Health Record Usability Issues and Potential Contribution to Patient Harm

              This study analyzed patient safety reports in and near Pennsylvania from 2013 through 2016 to identify those that contained explicit language associating possible patient harm with an electronic health record usability issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                thomas.schopf@ehealthresearch.no
                bsn@helsetilsynet.no
                karl.ove.hufthammer@helse-bergen.no
                inderjit.kaur.daphu@helse-bergen.no
                hallvard.laerum@ehelse.no
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                4 December 2019
                4 December 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 934
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4689 5540, GRID grid.412244.5, Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, , University Hospital of North-Norway, ; P.O. Box 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
                [2 ]Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, P.O. Box 231 Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9753 1393, GRID grid.412008.f, Centre for Clinical Research, , Haukeland University Hospital, ; P.O. Box 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9753 1393, GRID grid.412008.f, Section for e-Health, Department for Research and Development, , Haukeland University Hospital, ; P.O. Box 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0093 1110, GRID grid.461584.a, The Norwegian Directorate for e-health, ; P.O. Box 221 Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-5045
                Article
                4763
                10.1186/s12913-019-4763-0
                6894258
                31801518
                8552f967-c213-4988-aa50-9f72764a6881
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 June 2019
                : 20 November 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Health & Social care
                electronic health record,information and communication technology,hospital physician,clinical task,clinical decision support

                Comments

                Comment on this article