2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implant retained overdenture

      , , , , ,
      Journal of Prosthodontic Research
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d1023110e117">Several studies reported better outcomes when restoring edentulous mandible with unsplinted IODs compared to CCDs; however, it is not clear if these outcomes remain when the full literature is considered. The aim of this systematic review is to compare conventional complete dentures (CCDs) to unsplinted implant-retained overdentures (IODs) with regard to efficacy, satisfaction and quality of life. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Prosthodontic Research
          Journal of Prosthodontic Research
          Elsevier BV
          18831958
          January 2018
          January 2018
          : 62
          : 1
          : 1-9
          Article
          10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.004
          28666845
          82c6cc79-f500-4630-ac5e-bd93969b3b53
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article