2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association Between Frailty and Free-Living Walking Performance in People With Multiple Sclerosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The purpose of this study was to examine the association between frailty and the quantity and quality of free-living walking and the mediating effect of frailty on the relationship between disability and walking performance in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

          Methods

          Ninety-nine people with relapsing–remitting MS (mean age = 49.3 [SD = 9.8] years; 73.7% women; Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score range = 2.0–6.0) wore a triaxial accelerometer for 7 days. Recorded measures reflected the quantity (daily step counts, number of 30-second walking bouts, and signal vector magnitude [SVM]) and quality (gait speed, step cadence, step and stride regularity, and sample entropy) of walking. For each walking quality measure, the typical (median), best (90th percentile), and worst (10th percentile) values were calculated. Frailty was evaluated through a 38-item frailty index.

          Results

          Participants were classified as not frail (n = 31), moderately frail (n = 34), and severely frail (n = 34) on the basis of established procedures. Patients who were moderately and severely frail exhibited poorer performance in all measures of walking quantity and quality, except for sample entropy, than individuals who were not frail. No differences in free-living walking performance were observed between the moderately and severely frail groups. Frailty did not mediate the relationship between disability (EDSS) and measures of walking quality. Conversely, frailty had a significant mediating effect on the relationship between disability and measures of walking quantity, such as daily step counts (indirect effect: b = −220.42, 95% CI = −452.03 to −19.65) and SVM (indirect effect: b = −1.00, 95% CI = −1.86 to −0.30).

          Conclusion

          Frailty is associated with poorer free-living walking performance in people with MS. The study findings suggest that frailty, rather than disability, may be primarily responsible for the lower amount of physical activity performed by people with MS in the real world.

          Impact

          The observation that frailty and disability are differently related to measures of walking quality and quantity underscores the importance of a targeted approach to rehabilitation in people with MS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A standard procedure for creating a frailty index

            Background Frailty can be measured in relation to the accumulation of deficits using a frailty index. A frailty index can be developed from most ageing databases. Our objective is to systematically describe a standard procedure for constructing a frailty index. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the Yale Precipitating Events Project cohort study, based in New Haven CT. Non-disabled people aged 70 years or older (n = 754) were enrolled and re-contacted every 18 months. The database includes variables on function, cognition, co-morbidity, health attitudes and practices and physical performance measures. Data came from the baseline cohort and those available at the first 18-month follow-up assessment. Results Procedures for selecting health variables as candidate deficits were applied to yield 40 deficits. Recoding procedures were applied for categorical, ordinal and interval variables such that they could be mapped to the interval 0–1, where 0 = absence of a deficit, and 1= full expression of the deficit. These individual deficit scores were combined in an index, where 0= no deficit present, and 1= all 40 deficits present. The values of the index were well fit by a gamma distribution. Between the baseline and follow-up cohorts, the age-related slope of deficit accumulation increased from 0.020 (95% confidence interval, 0.014–0.026) to 0.026 (0.020–0.032). The 99% limit to deficit accumulation was 0.6 in the baseline cohort and 0.7 in the follow-up cohort. Multivariate Cox analysis showed the frailty index, age and sex to be significant predictors of mortality. Conclusion A systematic process for creating a frailty index, which relates deficit accumulation to the individual risk of death, showed reproducible properties in the Yale Precipitating Events Project cohort study. This method of quantifying frailty can aid our understanding of frailty-related health characteristics in older adults.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education.

              Normative data for the Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B are presented for 911 community-dwelling individuals aged 18-89 years. Performance on the TMT decreased with increasing age and lower levels of education. Based on these results, the norms were stratified for both age (11 groups) and education (2 levels). The current norms represent a more comprehensive set of norms than previously available and will increase the ability of neuropsychologists to determine more precisely the degree to which scores on the TMT reflect impaired performance for varying ages and education.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Physical Therapy
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0031-9023
                1538-6724
                May 01 2023
                May 04 2023
                May 01 2023
                May 04 2023
                March 07 2023
                : 103
                : 5
                Article
                10.1093/ptj/pzad032
                82850475-233e-4074-85e5-9bd34f5e9dde
                © 2023

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article