12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of genetic risks of alkylating agents. II. Haemoglobin as a dose monitor

      , , ,
      Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A MICRO-BIURET METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PROTEINS.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of genetic risks of alkylating agents: Tissue doses in the mouse from air contaminated with ethylene oxide

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nitrosamine-induced carcinogenesis. The alklylation of nucleic acids of the rat by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, dimethylnitrosamine, dimethyl sulphate and methyl methanesulphonate.

              1. N[(14)C]-Methyl-N-nitrosourea, [(14)C]dimethylnitrosamine, [(14)C]dimethyl sulphate and [(14)C]methyl methanesulphonate were injected into rats, and nucleic acids were isolated from several organs after various time-intervals. Radioactivity was detected in DNA and RNA, partly in major base components and partly as the methylated base, 7-methylguanine. 2. No 7-methylguanine was detected in liver DNA from normal untreated rats. 3. The specific radioactivity of 7-methylguanine isolated from DNA prepared from rats treated with [(14)C]dimethylnitrosamine was virtually the same as that of the dimethylnitrosamine injected. 4. The degree of methylation of RNA and DNA produced in various organs by each compound was determined, and expressed as a percentage of guanine residues converted into 7-methylguanine. With dimethylnitrosamine both nucleic acids were considerably more highly methylated in the liver (RNA, about 1% of guanine residues methylated; DNA, about 0.6% of guanine residues methylated) than in the other organs. Kidney nucleic acids were methylated to about one-tenth of the extent of those in the liver, lung showed slightly lower values and the other organs only very low values. N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea methylated nucleic acids to about the same extent in all the organs studied, the amount being about the same as that in the kidney after treatment with dimethylnitrosamine. In each case the RNA was more highly methylated than the DNA. Methyl methanesulphonate methylated the nucleic acids in several organs to about the same extent as N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, but the DNA was more highly methylated than the RNA. Dimethyl sulphate, even in toxic doses, gave considerably less methylation than N-methyl-N-nitrosourea in all the organs studied, the greatest methylation being in the brain. 5. The rate of removal of 7-methylguanine from DNA of kidneys from rats treated with dimethylnitrosamine was compared with the rate after treatment of rats with methyl methanesulphonate. No striking difference was found. 6. The results are discussed in connexion with the organ distribution of tumours induced by the compounds under study and in relation to the possible importance of alkylation of cellular components for the induction of cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
                Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
                Elsevier BV
                00275107
                January 1976
                January 1976
                : 34
                : 1
                : 1-10
                Article
                10.1016/0027-5107(76)90256-6
                828236ac-96b8-431e-9e72-0b3b891225eb
                © 1976

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article