20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Ages and Stages Questionnaire and Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Two-Year-Old Preterm-Born Children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To test the ability of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ3) to help identify or exclude neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in very preterm-born children at the corrected age of two.

          Methods

          We studied the test results of 224 children, born at <32 postmenstrual weeks, who had scores on ASQ3 and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSIDIII) and neurological examination at 22–26 months’ corrected age. We defined NDI as a score of <70 on the cognitive—or motor composite scale of BSIDIII, or impairment on neurological examination or audiovisual screening. We compared NDI with abnormal ASQ3 scores, i.e., < -2SDs on any domain, and with ASQ3 total scores. To correct for possible overestimation of BSIDIII, we also analyzed the adjusted BSIDIII thresholds for NDI, i.e., scores <80 and <85.

          Results

          We found 61 (27%) children with abnormal ASQ3 scores, and 10 (4.5%) children who had NDI with original BSIDIII thresholds (<70). Twelve children had NDI at BSIDIII thresholds at <80, and 15 had <85. None of the 163 (73%) children who passed ASQ3 had NDI. The sensitivity of ASQ3 to detect NDI was excellent (100%), its specificity was acceptable (76%), and its negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%. Sensitivity and NPV remained high with the adjusted BSIDIII thresholds.

          Conclusion

          The Ages and Stages Questionnaire is a simple, valid and cost-effective screening tool to help identify and exclude NDI in very preterm-born children at the corrected age of two years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE).

          (2000)
          Although cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of motor deficiency in young children, it occurs in only 2 to 3 per 1000 live births. In order to monitor prevalence rates, especially within subgroups (birthweight, clinical type), it is necessary to study large populations. A network of CP surveys and registers was formed in 14 centres in eight countries across Europe. Differences in prevalence rates of CP in the centres prior to any work on harmonization of data are reported. The subsequent process to standardize the definition of CP, inclusion/exclusion criteria, classification, and description of children with CP is outlined. The consensus that was reached on these issues will make it possible to monitor trends in CP rate, to provide a framework for collaborative research, and a basis for services planning among European countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale.

            To assess the ability of the third edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) to detect developmental delay in 2-year-old children who were extremely preterm and those carried to term. Prospective cohort study. The state of Victoria, Australia. Subjects were consecutive surviving children who were born either at less than 28 weeks' gestational age (extremely preterm) or with less than 1000 g birth weight (extremely low-birth-weight; n = 221) in the state of Victoria, Australia, in 2005 and randomly selected controls who were both carried to term and of normal birth weight (n = 220). Children were assessed by psychologists blinded to knowledge of group at 2 years of age, corrected for prematurity with the new Bayley-III scale. Follow-up rates of both cohorts were high (>92%). Mean values for all composite and subtest scores for the extremely preterm/extremely low-birth-weight group were significantly below those of the control group (P < .001), with the magnitude of all group differences being in excess of two-thirds SD. Mean values for the extremely preterm/extremely low-birth-weight group approached the normative mean, but in contrast, the mean values for the control group were higher than expected, with composite scores being between 0.55 and 1.23 SD above the normative mean. Proportions of children with developmental delay were grossly underestimated using the reference values, but were within the expected range when computed relative to the mean (standard deviation) for the controls. The Bayley-III scale seriously underestimates developmental delay in 2-year-old Australian children.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used?

              As the latest edition of the Bayley Scales (Bayley-III) produces higher scores than its predecessor (BSID-II), there is uncertainty about how to classify moderate-severe neurodevelopmental delay. We have investigated agreement between classifications of delay made using the BSID-II and Bayley-III. BSID-II Mental Development Index (MDI) and Bayley-III cognitive and language scales were administered in 185 extremely preterm (<27 wk) children. A combined Bayley-III score (CB-III) was computed. Agreement between delay classified using MDI scores <70 and various Bayley-III cut-offs was assessed. Bayley-III cognitive and language scores were close to the normative mean and were higher than BSID-II MDI scores. Nineteen (10.2%) children had MDI <70. Bayley-III scores <70 significantly underestimated the proportion with MDI <70. Bayley-III cognitive and language scores <85 had 99% agreement with MDI <70 and underestimated delay by 1.1%. CB-III scores <80 had 98% agreement and produced the same proportion with delay. Bayley-III cognitive and language scores <85 or CB-III scores <80 provide the best definition of moderate-severe neurodevelopmental delay for equivalence with MDI <70. CB-III scores have the advantage of producing a single continuous outcome measure but require further validation. The relative accuracy of both tests for predicting long-term outcomes requires investigation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                20 July 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 7
                : e0133087
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Medical Psychology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Princess Amalia Department of Pediatrics, Department of Neonatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [10 ]Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, FRANCE
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exists.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JK AN CH DvI AvWL IvH EL RvL PD. Performed the experiments: JK AN CH DvI AvWL IvH EL TK RS RvL TM CL KS PD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JK AN CH DvI PD. Wrote the paper: JK AN CH DvI AvWL IvH EL TK RS RvL TM CL KS PD.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-07564
                10.1371/journal.pone.0133087
                4508030
                26193474
                814b5c46-a8b8-40b4-b435-695ebbc37730
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 18 February 2015
                : 22 June 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 14
                Funding
                This work was funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) Cost-Effectiveness Program: 94507407. The authors received no other specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                Data are restricted by Dutch Laws on Privacy and Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Readers may contact the first or last author of the manuscript: J.M. Kerstjens ( j.m.kerstjens@ 123456umcg.nl ) and P.H.Dijk ( p.h.dijk@ 123456umcg.nl ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article