6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identifying Risk Factors for Lower Reproductive Tract Infections among Women Using Reusable Absorbents in Odisha, India

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A large proportion of women in Odisha, India, use reusable absorbents to manage their menstruation. Yet, the risk factors for lower reproductive tract infections (RTIs) related to menstrual hygiene management (MHM) have not been studied among reusable absorbent users. Women of reproductive age attending one of two hospitals from two different cities in Odisha during two separate study intervals were recruited for the study. Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) were conducted. A questionnaire was used to collect information on MHM practices, water, sanitation, and socio-demographic factors. Among the 509 women who used reusable absorbents, 71.7% were diagnosed with at least one infection. After adjusting for confounders, women with BV were more likely to identify as being a housewife (aOR: 1.8 (1.1–2.9)). Frequent absorbent changing was protective against BV (aOR: 0.5 (0.3–0.8)), whereas frequent body washing increased the odds of BV (aOR: 1.5 (1.0–2.2)). Women with VVC were more likely to be older (aOR: 1.6 (1.0–2.5)), live below the poverty line (aOR: 1.5 (1.1–2.2)), have a non-private household latrine (aOR: 2.2 (1.3–4.0)), dry their absorbents inside the house (aOR: 3.7 (2.5–4.5)), and store absorbents in the latrine area (aOR: 2.0 (1.3–2.9)). Washing absorbents outside the house was protective against VVC (aOR: 0.7 (0.4–1.0)). This study highlights the importance of improving MHM practices among reusable absorbent users to prevent lower RTIs among women reusing menstrual materials in Odisha.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vulvovaginal candidosis.

          Despite therapeutic advances, vulvovaginal candidosis remains a common problem worldwide, affecting all strata of society. Understanding of anti-candida host defence mechanisms in the vagina has developed slowly and, despite a growing list of recognised risk factors, a fundamental grasp of pathogenic mechanisms continues to elude us. The absence of rapid, simple, and inexpensive diagnostic tests continues to result in both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of vulvovaginal candidosis. I review the epidemiology and pathogenesis of this infection, and also discuss management strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

            The purpose of the study was to examine intercenter variability in the interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears from pregnant women. The intercenter reliability of individual morphotypes identified on the vaginal smear was evaluated by comparing them with those obtained at a standard center. A new scoring system that uses the most reliable morphotypes from the vaginal smear was proposed for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. This scoring system was compared with the Spiegel criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. The scoring system (0 to 10) was described as a weighted combination of the following morphotypes: lactobacilli, Gardnerella vaginalis or bacteroides (small gram-variable rods or gram-negative rods), and curved gram-variable rods. By using the Spearman rank correlation to determine intercenter variability, gram-positive cocci had poor agreement (0.23); lactobacilli (0.65), G. vaginalis (0.69), and bacteroides (0.57) had moderate agreement; and small (0.74) and curved (0.85) gram-variable rods had good agreement. The reliability of the 0 to 10 scoring system was maximized by not using gram-positive cocci, combining G. vaginalis and bacteroides morphotypes, and weighting more heavily curved gram-variable rods. For comparison with the Spiegel criteria, a score of 7 or higher was considered indicative of bacterial vaginosis. The standardized score had improved intercenter reliability (r = 0.82) compared with the Spiegel criteria (r = 0.61). The standardized score also facilitates future research concerning bacterial vaginosis because it provides gradations of the disturbance of vaginal flora which may be associated with different levels of risk for pregnancy complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach.

              This paper discusses appropriate strategies for multivariate data analysis in epidemiological studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                29 April 2021
                May 2021
                : 18
                : 9
                : 4778
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Biological Sciences, AIPH University, Bhubaneswar 752101, Odisha, India; pdas1234@ 123456gmail.com (P.D.); shalini.sinha58@ 123456yahoo.com (S.S.); pranatip123@ 123456gmail.com (P.S.)
                [2 ]London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK; daniellelisnek@ 123456gmail.com (D.L.); clare.tanton@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk (C.T.)
                [3 ]ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar 751023, Odisha, India; sahookrushna@ 123456yahoo.com
                [4 ]Disease Surveillance Laboratory, Asian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India; JRrmmohanty@ 123456aiph.ac.in
                [5 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ispat General Hospital, Rourkela 769005, Odisha, India; drpiabilung@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Capital Hospital, Bhubaneswar 751001, Odisha, India; bijayap662@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-7670
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3504-6132
                Article
                ijerph-18-04778
                10.3390/ijerph18094778
                8124764
                33947145
                801c0caf-a05d-47b6-ab32-ac27e1cc3e26
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 February 2021
                : 09 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                menstrual hygiene management,reusable absorbents,bacterial vaginosis,candidiasis,reproductive tract infections

                Comments

                Comment on this article