12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Structure of neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1): insights for the functional variability across bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonists.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are antagonized through the action of numerous extracellular protein antagonists, including members from the differential screening-selected gene aberrative in neuroblastoma (DAN) family. In vivo, misregulation of the balance between BMP signaling and DAN inhibition can lead to numerous disease states, including cancer, kidney nephropathy, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Despite this importance, very little information is available describing how DAN family proteins effectively inhibit BMP ligands. Furthermore, our understanding for how differences in individual DAN family members arise, including affinity and specificity, remains underdeveloped. Here, we present the structure of the founding member of the DAN family, neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1). Comparing NBL1 to the structure of protein related to Dan and Cerberus (PRDC), a more potent BMP antagonist within the DAN family, a number of differences were identified. Through a mutagenesis-based approach, we were able to correlate the BMP binding epitope in NBL1 with that in PRDC, where introduction of specific PRDC amino acids in NBL1 (A58F and S67Y) correlated with a gain-of-function inhibition toward BMP2 and BMP7, but not GDF5. Although NBL1(S67Y) was able to antagonize BMP7 as effectively as PRDC, NBL1(S67Y) was still 32-fold weaker than PRDC against BMP2. Taken together, this data suggests that alterations in the BMP binding epitope can partially account for differences in the potency of BMP inhibition within the DAN family.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Biol. Chem.
          The Journal of biological chemistry
          American Society for Biochemistry & Molecular Biology (ASBMB)
          1083-351X
          0021-9258
          Feb 20 2015
          : 290
          : 8
          Affiliations
          [1 ] From the Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267 and.
          [2 ] the Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation and Department of Pediatrics, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229.
          [3 ] From the Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267 and tom.thompson@uc.edu.
          Article
          M114.628412
          10.1074/jbc.M114.628412
          4335214
          25561725
          7c3108ff-4477-4028-b02f-c7ee14335c6d
          History

          X-ray Crystallography,Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP),Differential Screening-aberrative in Neuroblastoma (DAN),Extracellular Antagonism,Mutagenesis,Neuroblastoma Suppressor of Tumorigenicity 1 (NBL1),Protein Related to Dan and Cerberus (PRDC),SOST,Structural Biology,Transforming Growth Factor β(TGF-B)

          Comments

          Comment on this article