5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Love in the time of COVID‐19: A systematic mapping review of empirical research on romantic relationships one year into the COVID‐19 pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID‐19 pandemic has affected nearly every area of daily life, including romantic relationships. With the pandemic still ongoing, this study reviewed the existing scholarly literature to document the status of empirical research on how COVID‐19 has affected couples during its first year. Studies were identified through searching five databases as well as sources of gray literature. Overall, 42 studies on committed romantic relationships during the first year of the pandemic were identified. The mapping process revealed four main themes: (1) relationship quality; (2) sexuality; (3) couple daily adjustment; and (4) intimate partner violence. The findings suggest that the way romantic relationships were affected by the pandemic depends on a variety of demographic, individual, and couple‐level factors. Implications include a call for both the development of evidence‐based interventions that consider the current findings and further research to continue exploring the clinical implications of future findings to promote healthy intimate relationships during the ongoing global pandemic.

          摘要

          COVID‐19疫情几乎影响了日常生活的每一个领域, 包括恋爱关系。由于疫情仍在持续, 本研究回顾了现有的学术文献, 以记录COVID‐19在第一年如何影响伴侣的实证研究现状。通过检索五个数据库以及灰色文献来源确定研究。总的来说, 在疫情的第一年, 确定了42项关于承诺恋爱关系的研究。梳理分析过程揭示了四个主要主题: 1) 关系质量; 2) 性行为; 3) 伴侣日常调整; 4) 亲密伴侣暴力。这些发现表明, 浪漫关系受到疫情影响的方式取决于各种人口统计学、个人和夫妻层面的因素。影响包括呼吁开发基于证据的干预措施, 考虑目前的研究结果和进一步的研究, 继续探索未来的研究结果的临床意义, 以促进正在延续中的全球疫情中的健康亲密关系。

          Related collections

          Most cited references100

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          The COVID-19 pandemic poses an acute threat to the well-being of children and families due to challenges related to social disruption such as financial insecurity, caregiving burden, and confinement-related stress (e.g., crowding, changes to structure, and routine). The consequences of these difficulties are likely to be longstanding, in part because of the ways in which contextual risk permeates the structures and processes of family systems. The current article draws from pertinent literature across topic areas of acute crises and long-term, cumulative risk to illustrate the multitude of ways in which the well-being of children and families may be at risk during COVID-19. The presented conceptual framework is based on systemic models of human development and family functioning and links social disruption due to COVID-19 to child adjustment through a cascading process involving caregiver well-being and family processes (i.e., organization, communication, and beliefs). An illustration of the centrality of family processes in buffering against risk in the context of COVID-19, as well as promoting resilience through shared family beliefs and close relationships, is provided. Finally, clinical and research implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stress and Parenting during the Global COVID-19 Pandemic

              Background Stress and compromised parenting often place children at risk of abuse and neglect. Child maltreatment has generally been viewed as a highly individualistic problem by focusing on stressors and parenting behaviors that impact individual families. However, because of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), families across the world are experiencing a new range of stressors that threaten their health, safety, and economic well-being. Objective This study examined the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to parental perceived stress and child abuse potential. Participants and Setting Participants included parents (N = 183) with a child under the age of 18 years in the western United States. Method Tests of group differences and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were employed to assess the relationships among demographic characteristics, COVID-19 related stressors, mental health risk, protective factors, parental perceived stress, and child abuse potential. Results Greater COVID-19 related stressors and high anxiety and depressive symptoms are associated with higher parental perceived stress and child abuse potential. Conversely, greater parental support and perceived control during the pandemic may have a protective effect against perceived stress and child abuse potential. Results also indicate racial and ethnic differences in COVID-19 related stressors, but not in mental health risk, protective factors, perceived stress, or child abuse potential. Conclusion Findings suggest that although families experience elevated stressors from COVID-19, providing parental support and increasing perceived control may be promising intervention targets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                restlein@univ.haifa.ac.il
                Journal
                Fam Process
                Fam Process
                10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300
                FAMP
                Family Process
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0014-7370
                1545-5300
                13 April 2022
                13 April 2022
                : 10.1111/famp.12775
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Center for Research and Study of the Family School of Social Work University of Haifa Haifa Israel
                [ 2 ] Health and Human Services Librarian University of New Hampshire Durham New Hampshire USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Roi Estlein, Center for Research and Study of the Family, School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel.

                Email: restlein@ 123456univ.haifa.ac.il

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-6050
                Article
                FAMP12775
                10.1111/famp.12775
                9111335
                35419816
                778bc851-d8e3-4f48-9e66-90f94e3fc048
                © 2022 The Authors. Family Process published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Family Process Institute.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 02 March 2022
                : 10 September 2021
                : 02 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 21, Words: 12906
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.6 mode:remove_FC converted:17.05.2022

                covid‐19,couples,ipv,romantic relationships,sexuality,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article