23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Sociocultural Appraisals, Values, and Emotions (SAVE) Framework of Prosociality: Core Processes from Gene to Meme

      1 , 2 , 1 , 3
      Annual Review of Psychology
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The study of prosocial behavior—altruism, cooperation, trust, and the related moral emotions—has matured enough to produce general scholarly consensus that prosociality is widespread, intuitive, and rooted deeply within our biological makeup. Several evolutionary frameworks model the conditions under which prosocial behavior is evolutionarily viable, yet no unifying treatment exists of the psychological decision-making processes that result in prosociality. Here, we provide such a perspective in the form of the sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality. We review evidence for the components of our framework at four levels of analysis: intrapsychic, dyadic, group, and cultural. Within these levels, we consider how phenomena such as altruistic punishment, prosocial contagion, self–other similarity, and numerous others give rise to prosocial behavior. We then extend our reasoning to chart the biological underpinnings of prosociality and apply our framework to understand the role of social class in prosociality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references248

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success?

              Numerous studies show that happy individuals are successful across multiple life domains, including marriage, friendship, income, work performance, and health. The authors suggest a conceptual model to account for these findings, arguing that the happiness-success link exists not only because success makes people happy, but also because positive affect engenders success. Three classes of evidence--crosssectional, longitudinal, and experimental--are documented to test their model. Relevant studies are described and their effect sizes combined meta-analytically. The results reveal that happiness is associated with and precedes numerous successful outcomes, as well as behaviors paralleling success. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that positive affect--the hallmark of well-being--may be the cause of many of the desirable characteristics, resources, and successes correlated with happiness. Limitations, empirical issues, and important future research questions are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Psychology
                Annu. Rev. Psychol.
                Annual Reviews
                0066-4308
                1545-2085
                January 03 2014
                January 03 2014
                : 65
                : 1
                : 425-460
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720;
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom;
                [3 ]School of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331;
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115054
                24405363
                766e44be-c904-47bc-869c-f86dd5313234
                © 2014
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article