Publications
Preprints
About UCL Open: Env.
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing
APCs
How to cite
Publishing policies
Editorial policy
Peer review policy
Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
About UCL Press
Contact us
Information for authors
How it works
Benefits of publishing with us
Submit
How to submit
Preparing your manuscript
Article types
Open Data
ORCID
APCs
Contributor agreement
Information for reviewers
Review process
How to peer review
Peer review policy
Register Dashboard
Search
931
views
0
references
 Top references
0
cited by
 Most cited
    
2 reviews
 Review
4
comments
 Comment
3
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      111
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integrating tsunami risk assessments in development planning: lessons from Western India

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Online
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A natural, if idealised, picture of the role of risk assessments in planning sees decision-makers drawing on the risk projections provided by natural and social scientific models and fashioning policies or plans that maximise expected benefit relative to this information. In this paper we draw on our study of the use tsunami science in development planning in Western India to identify ways in which this idealised picture fails to reflect important difficulties encountered by both the science and policy domains, including the representation and communication of scientific uncertainty and the management of this uncertainty within the planning system. We highlight aspects of the management of these uncertainties pose pressing problems and make some suggestions as to how they might be resolved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Title: UCL Open: Environment Preprint
          Publisher: UCL Press
          Publication date (Electronic preprint): 17 December 2019
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
          [2 ] Department of Statistical Science, University College London
          [3 ] Indian Institute for Human Settlements
          [4 ] The Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London
          Article
          DOI: 10.14324/111.444/000026.v1
          License:

          This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

          Funding
          NERC-AHRC-ESRC NE/P016367/1

          Data availability: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

          ScienceOpen disciplines: Urban development, Applied probability & Statistics, General earth science, Epistemology

          Keywords: Sustainable and resilient cities, tsunami, hazard, risk assessment, development planning, modelling, India, disaster, Environmental science, Environmental policy and practice, Statistics

          Comments

          wrote:

          Decision Date: 31/7/2020

          Handling Editor: Dan Osborn

          The Handling Editor requested revisions; the article has been returned to the authors to make this revision.

          2020-09-17 12:56 UTC
          +1
          wrote:

          Decision Date: 20/12/2019

          Handling Editor: Dan Osborn

          This article is a preprint article and has not been peer-reviewed. It is under consideration following submission to UCL Open: Environment Preprint for open peer review.

          2020-09-17 12:55 UTC
          +1
          wrote:

          --- the authors must account for the fundamental comment about data and information contained in the remarks of Reviewer 2. The paper needs to sound less like a popular article and contain enough data to qualify as a research paper. If the authors intend this to be a commentary article then they need to develop the article further in line with, or through acknowledging the work of the many international bodies who deal with issues linked to tsunamis and other extreme events. That does not of curse preclude use of data of diagrams etc that might aid understanding,

           

          --- Reviewer 1 questions the choice of words at several points in the text and implies that more attention is needed to these parts of the paper to clarify understanding. All the points referred to must be addressed if the paper is to be fully published. His points on aligning the paper with international efforts or, alternatively, using these as a broader context for the paper need to be addressed.

          On behal of Dan Osborn, 

          Editor-in-Chief

          2020-07-31 12:22 UTC
          +1
          wrote:

          Comments received from Aromar Revi: 

          It could have said a little more about how we can reduce uncertainty in at least a few dimensions. Else, there is limited space for a research agenda to be built. For example, there is a fair degree that can be learned/borrowed from storm surge inundation modeling and responses along the western coast and most certainly the eastern coast. There are masses of work done on both modeling and implementation around NCRMP in Gujarat. 

          2020-01-06 17:45 UTC
          +1
          One person recommends this

          Comment on this article