11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Challenge of COVID-19 crisis managed by emergency department of a big tertiary centre in Saudi Arabia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic wave. King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh dealt with the crisis in a proactive way with the emergency department (ED) playing a pivotal role.

          Patients and methods

          We searched the international literature, to review the processes adopted by healthcare institutions and also used our experience of managing a previous epidemic, to devise safe processes for our ED patients.

          Results

          The interventions done by ED, led to safer patient care, the avoidance of unnecessary admissions, reduced risk of cross infection and enhanced staff safety.

          Conclusions

          Integrated ED processes helped streamline Covid-19 patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19 Outbreak in Malaysia: Actions Taken by the Malaysian Government

          Highlights e • COVID-19 was deemed a pandemic because of corona virus spread. • Malaysia government has taken significant precautions to prevent virus transmission. • Movement Control Order has diminished the number of new cases per day. • Article could be helpful for COVID-19 detection, diagnosis, and recovery.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Hospital Emergency Management Plan During the COVID‐19 Epidemic

            The confirmed and suspected cases of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) have increased not only in Wuhan, Hubei Province, but also China and the world. Enormous demand for handling the COVID‐19 outbreak challenged both the health care personnel and the medical supply system. In West China Hospital, emergency department (ED) undertook the mission of clinical reception, primary diagnosis, and interim treatment for the suspected cases of COVID‐19. The pathogen of COVID‐19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, was confirmed to have human‐to‐human transmission.1 Therefore, COVID‐19 has expanded the infection risk from Wuhan to cities throughout China and even the world via case transportation.2 Providing qualified personal protection equipment (PPE) to health care personnel plays an essential role in avoiding occupational exposure and infection. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for COVID‐19 infection control of health care personnel recommended gloves, gowns, respiratory protection, and eye protection as standardized PPE.3 However, protective clothing, N95 respirators, and goggles are not commonly used in clinical practice and hence are not in bulk stock. This brief report aims to present our interim hospital management measures on the health care personnel protection in West China Hospital under the condition of intense workload and PPE supply shortage after the outbreak of COVID‐19. We retrospectively reviewed the daily ED visits and PPE supply records from January 13 to February 1, 2020. The fever visits at the ED soared from January 20 to January 25. The ratio of fever patients at the ED exploded to a peak of over 40% on January 25 and then fluctuated at about 30% (Figure 1A). Protective clothing, N95 respirators, and goggles could only ensure the daily supply for < 15% ED personnel (Figure 1B). However, West China Hospital adopted a series of measures to achieve “zero infection” among health care personnel. First, the online clinic was set to facilitate the patient triage (Figure 1C). Through free online consultation, the hospital preliminarily judged the treatment urgency, recommended nonemergency patients to delay hospital appointments or visit other nonantiepidemic hospitals, provided low‐suspected patients treatment instruction when self‐isolating at home, and invited high‐suspected patients to the Fever Clinic via the green channel. The online clinic effectively alleviated the ED workload and facilitated early detection of potential cases. Second, the interim visit triage and ED region separation were established (Figure 1D). The assigned personnel conducted preexamination and triage to divide visits into low‐suspected, high‐suspected, and other patients and required different patients to follow the specified routines to enter ED and separate the intra‐ED space into high‐risk and low‐risk regions. For suspected cases, the hospital assigned an independent fever clinic room, fever observation room, and CT examination room. Cases confirmed through qRT‐PCR and/or CT were transferred to quarantine ward while excluded patients went to other departments or back home. The ED region separation triage system reduced the cross‐infection by restricting the activity ranges of both patients and ED personnel. Third, the ED requirement had the highest priority. The hospital established a capable command system, implemented effective coordination mechanisms,4 provided the ED with PPE and medical devices preferentially, equipped the triage and high‐risk‐region personnel with standardized personal protection, withdrew or postponed nonurgent appointments and operations, and dispatched aid personnel from other departments to ED. These measures concentrated the limited supply through the hospital on the staff who mostly needed protection. Figure 1 ED workload, PPE shortage, and hospital management plan during the COVID‐19 epidemic. (A) The daily number and ratio of fever visits at the ED from January 13 to February 1, 2020. (B) The PPE supply ratio at the ED of West China Hospital on January 25. (C) The illustration of online clinic triage of West China Hospital. (D) The illustration of ED triage and region separation. NHC = National Healthcare Commission; T = temperature. Emergency‐ and disaster‐preparedness was an important issue and a global problem. Most hospitals could not maintain their routine work for a week due to the disaster‐related resource shortage.5 A previous review highlighted the challenge of the emergency ordering of standardized PPE supply.6 The hospital invested greater efforts to establish an emergency management system based on the anticipated hazard.7 However, the unpredictable epidemic rendered the interim PPE preparedness impossible, especially for less‐used PPE, protective clothing, and N95 respirators in daily work. It might be more practical to prepare a flexible hospital contingency plan than abundant PPE preparedness. Our hospital adopted interim measures, including online consultation, region separation, and epidemic priority, to alleviate the pressure in the clinical work, reduce the cross‐infection, and strengthen the protection of high‐risk staff. Our hospital held the “zero infection” record, which was far lower than the simultaneous outside‐Hubei mean level of 3.4% in late January.8 The zero infection indicated the flexibility and validity of our interim hospital management strategy. However, there were still some limitations. First, the supply protocol compromised the health protection of low‐risk personnel without standardized PPE. Second, the interim management strategies could not resist large‐scale outbreak and long‐term PPE shortage. Nevertheless, our management strategies, as a temporary emergency plan, created the biggest benefits of extremely limited resources to meet the emergency need. The long‐term solution should be a sustainable supply chain. Fortunately, the government of China recovered the PPE production supply in February, which alleviated the supply shortage significantly. In conclusion, the hospital emergency management plan of West China Hospital could alleviate the ED workload, protect health care personnel, and control the cross‐infection during the COVID‐19 epidemic. We advocate that every hospital should create the contingency plan suited to their conditions. We acknowledge the colleagues at Emergency Department of West China Hospital and also all the colleagues combating COVID‐19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Three Steps Needed to End the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bold Public Health Leadership, Rapid Innovations, and Courageous Political Will

              The world is experiencing the expansive spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a global pandemic that is placing strain on health care, economic, and social systems. Commitment to implementing proven public health strategies will require bold public health leadership and courageous acts by politicians. Developing new innovative communication, mitigation, and health care approaches, particularly in the era of social media, is also clearly warranted. We believe that the best public health evidence must inform activities in three priority areas to stop this pandemic: (1) coordinated and consistent stay-at-home orders across multiple jurisdictions, including potential nationwide mandates; (2) rapid scale-up of SARS-CoV-2 testing; and (3) improved health care capacity to respond. This editorial outlines those areas, the rationale behind them, and the call for innovation and engagement of bold public health leadership to empower courageous political action to reduce the number of deaths during this pandemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med
                Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med
                International Journal of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
                Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia.
                2352-6467
                26 August 2020
                26 August 2020
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Emergency Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. mqureshi@ 123456kfshrc.edu.sa
                Article
                S2352-6467(20)30064-8
                10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.08.001
                7448782
                32868998
                74932b0c-88d6-41ff-a45f-655980827460
                © 2020 Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 11 July 2020
                : 12 August 2020
                Categories
                Article

                covid-19 crisis,emergency department,process
                covid-19 crisis, emergency department, process

                Comments

                Comment on this article