4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Small-scale fisheries catch more threatened elasmobranchs inside partially protected areas than in unprotected areas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Elasmobranchs are heavily impacted by fishing. Catch statistics are grossly underestimated due to missing data from various fishery sectors such as small-scale fisheries. Marine Protected Areas are proposed as a tool to protect elasmobranchs and counter their ongoing depletion. We assess elasmobranchs caught in 1,256 fishing operations with fixed nets carried out in partially protected areas within Marine Protected Areas and unprotected areas beyond Marine Protected Areas borders at 11 locations in 6 Mediterranean countries. Twenty-four elasmobranch species were recorded, more than one-third belonging to the IUCN threatened categories (Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered). Catches per unit of effort of threatened and data deficient species were higher (with more immature individuals being caught) in partially protected areas than in unprotected areas. Our study suggests that despite partially protected areas having the potential to deliver ecological benefits for threatened elasmobranchs, poor small-scale fisheries management inside Marine Protected Areas could hinder them from achieving this important conservation objective.

          Abstract

          Marine protected areas are proposed to protect elasmobranchs (sharks, skates, and rays) but the fishing impact from small-scale fisheries in these areas is unknown. From 1256 fishing operations carried out in partially protected and unprotected areas in six Mediterranean countries, this study shows that catches were higher in partially protected areas than in unprotected areas, indicating poor small-scale fisheries management as a threat for these species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new look at the statistical model identification

          IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model

            A large body of literature is available on wound healing in humans. Nonetheless, a standardized ex vivo wound model without disruption of the dermal compartment has not been put forward with compelling justification. Here, we present a novel wound model based on application of negative pressure and its effects for epidermal regeneration and immune cell behaviour. Importantly, the basement membrane remained intact after blister roof removal and keratinocytes were absent in the wounded area. Upon six days of culture, the wound was covered with one to three-cell thick K14+Ki67+ keratinocyte layers, indicating that proliferation and migration were involved in wound closure. After eight to twelve days, a multi-layered epidermis was formed expressing epidermal differentiation markers (K10, filaggrin, DSG-1, CDSN). Investigations about immune cell-specific manners revealed more T cells in the blister roof epidermis compared to normal epidermis. We identified several cell populations in blister roof epidermis and suction blister fluid that are absent in normal epidermis which correlated with their decrease in the dermis, indicating a dermal efflux upon negative pressure. Together, our model recapitulates the main features of epithelial wound regeneration, and can be applied for testing wound healing therapies and investigating underlying mechanisms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                manfredi.dilorenzo@libero.it
                antonio.difranco@szn.it
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                9 August 2022
                9 August 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 4381
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.6401.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1758 0806, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Sicily Marine Center, Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo (complesso Roosevelt), ; 90149 Palermo, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.10776.37, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 5517, Department of Earth and Marine sciences (DiSTeM), , University of Palermo, ; Via Archirafi 20-22, 90123 Palermo, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.10911.38, ISNI 0000 0005 0387 0033, CoNISMa, ; Piazzale Flaminio 9, 00196 Rome, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Integrative Marine Ecology (EMI), Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn–National Institute of Marine Biology, Ecology and Biotechnology, Genoa Marine Centre, 16126 Genoa, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.5326.2, ISNI 0000 0001 1940 4177, National Research Council, Institute for the Study of Anthropic Impact and sustainability in the Marine Environment (CNR-IAS), ; Via de Marini 6, 16149 Genova, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3786-5772
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-6751
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-9706
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9562-1330
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-0542
                Article
                32035
                10.1038/s41467-022-32035-3
                9363485
                35945205
                7469d0e6-13d8-4608-9a9d-0b10982d8529
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 July 2021
                : 11 July 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                ecology,conservation biology
                Uncategorized
                ecology, conservation biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article