2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Subduction Initiation at the Solomon Back‐Arc Basin: Contributions From Both Island Arc Rheological Strength and Oceanic Plateau Collision

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is generally accepted that the subduction polarity reversal (SPR) results from the strong collision of two plates. Yet, the SPR of the Solomon Back‐arc Basin is started in the “soft docking” stage, and the mechanism by which the “soft docking” induced subduction initiation (SI) remains elusive. We find that the mass depletion of the plateau influences the evolution of the subduction patterns during SI. And the island arc rheological strength affects the development of the shear zone between an island arc and back‐arc basin which favors SI. What's more, with the increase of the rheological strength difference, the SI is more easily to occur, and the contribution of the plateau collision to SI weakens. Hence, by combining the available geological evidence, we suggest that the Solomon Island Arc rheological strength and the Ontong‐Java plateau collision jointly controlled the SI during the “soft docking” stage.

          Plain Language Summary

          Plateau collision has been considered an important factor for the subduction initiation (SI). However, the SI of the Solomon Sea Basin occurred during the “soft docking” stage, which is unique from the traditional understanding of SI. Our numerical model shows that the rheological strength difference between the SIA and the Solomon Sea Basin results in the conjugate shear zone with a high strain rate during the “soft docking” stage. The conjugate shear zone with a high strain rate as a natural weak zone is conducive to inducing SI. Moreover, while the SI (the San Cristobal Trench) occurs, the OJP likes a “wall” has resulted in the uplift of the SIA and the distinct evolution of subduction patterns.

          Key Points

          • The subduction initiation at the SSB results from joint contributions of both SIA rheological strength and OJP collision

          • The island arc affects the development of shear zone between an island arc and back‐arc basin, which favors subduction initiation

          • The mass depletion of the lithospheric mantle in the OJP influences the evolution of subduction patterns after subduction initiation

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: computer-based reconstructions, model and animations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A new global model forPwave speed variations in Earth's mantle

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Geophysical Research Letters
                Geophysical Research Letters
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                0094-8276
                1944-8007
                February 16 2022
                February 10 2022
                February 16 2022
                : 49
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System, MOE and College of Marine Geosciences Ocean University of China Qingdao China
                [2 ] Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology Qingdao China
                [3 ] Department of Earth Sciences Science Laboratories Durham University Durham UK
                [4 ] Key Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics College of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
                Article
                10.1029/2021GL097666
                74276d75-5c68-476c-83c1-6864e8c144d4
                © 2022

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article