18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Substantive Narrative Review on the Usage of Lidocaine in Cataract Surgery

      review-article
      1 , , 2 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 4
      ,
      Cureus
      Cureus
      fentanyl, corneal epithelium, phenylephrine, lidocaine, cataract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cataracts are a disease that causes a gradual decrease in visual prowess and requires surgery when the symptoms progress to an abhorrent state. This disease can be treated through surgical procedures that use anesthetics, such as lidocaine. Through inhibiting sensory nerve propagation to the brain, lidocaine plays an invaluable part in reducing pain for patients that undergo cataract surgery. Current clinical practice commonly utilizes 2% lidocaine with fentanyl as a combination agent. However, recent studies have reported that concentrations higher than 1% can cause substantial alteration to corneal epithelium cells. Additionally, fentanyl is cited as an extremely addictive opioid inappropriate for continual use in cataract surgeries. In this review, the authors examine the application and concentration of lidocaine, along with the various combination agents that were reported in several studies that describe the usage of the anesthetic during cataract surgery. Within the review, it was found that most surgeons generally only use lidocaine gel on the corneal epithelium tissue of patients during cataract surgery. Perhaps this standard could change over time as it is generally known that using intracameral injections in conjunction with topical anesthesia produces better patient outcomes. The authors find that although anesthetics and surgical treatment for cataracts are generally beneficial for patients, there are still many adjustments that could be implemented to enhance patient outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Increasing incidence of cataract surgery: population-based study.

          To estimate the incidence of cataract surgery in a defined population and to determine longitudinal cataract surgery patterns.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Uniform assessment and ranking of opioid μ receptor binding constants for selected opioid drugs.

            The safe disposal of unused opioid drugs is an area of regulatory concern. While toilet flushing is recommended for some drugs to prevent accidental exposure, there is a need for data that can support a more consistent disposal policy based on an assessment of relative risk. For drugs acting at the Mu-opioid receptor (MOR), published measurements of binding affinity (K(i)) are incomplete and inconsistent due to differences in methodology and assay system, leading to a wide range of values for the same drug thus precluding a simple and meaningful relative ranking of drug potency. Experiments were conducted to obtain K(i)'s for 19 approved opioid drugs using a single binding assay in a cell membrane preparation expressing recombinant human MOR. The K(i) values obtained ranged from 0.1380 nM (sufentanil) to 12.486 μM (tramadol). The drugs were separated into three categories based upon their K(i) values: K(i) > 100 nM (tramadol, codeine, meperidine, propoxyphene and pentazocine), K(i)=1-100 nM (hydrocodone, oxycodone, diphenoxylate, alfentanil, methadone, nalbuphine, fentanyl and morphine) and K(i) < 1 nM (butorphanol, levorphanol, oxymorphone, hydromorphone, buprenorphine and sufentanil). These data add to the understanding of the pharmacology of opioid drugs and support the development of a more consistent labeling policies regarding safe disposal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2000-2004): incidence, clinical settings, and visual acuity outcomes after treatment.

              To report the incidence, clinical settings, and visual acuity outcomes of acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Retrospective, observational case series. Annual cataract surgery statistics were determined by review of electronic surgical records. The clinical and microbiologic records were reviewed of all patients with clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis within 6 weeks after cataract surgery at a single university-affiliated hospital between January 2000 and November 2004. main outcome measures: Operative technique, intraoperative complications, and visual acuity. The incidence of acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery was 0.04% (7/15,920) for cataract surgeries of all methods, 0.05% (6/11,462) for cataract surgery by clear cornea phacoemulsification, and 0.02% (1/4,458) for cataract surgery by methods other than clear cornea phacoemulsification (P = .681, Fisher's exact test). Six of seven (86%) cases occurred in the right eye, and all cases were performed by right-handed surgeons through temporal incisions. Five of seven (71%) patients had relative immune compromise. Four of seven (57%) patients had an intraoperative complication: vitreous loss in three patients and iris prolapse in one patient. Two patients had topical placement of lidocaine 2% gel before povidone-iodine preparation. The visual acuity at final follow up was 20/25 or better in four patients and count fingers or worse in three patients. The incidence of acute-onset endophthalmitis after temporal clear cornea incision phacoemulsification is low (0.05%). Potential risk factors for endophthalmitis may include intraoperative complications, relative immune compromise, application of lidocaine 2% gel before povidone-iodine preparation, and inferior incision location.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                30 October 2021
                October 2021
                : 13
                : 10
                : e19138
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Opthalmology, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA
                [2 ] Anaesthesia, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA
                [3 ] Health Sciences, California Northstate University College of Health Sciences, Rancho Cordova, USA
                [4 ] Psychiatry, Mercy General Hospital, Sacramento, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.19138
                8559888
                34737914
                7340a4a4-b01e-463c-b7ff-bab94935f1bd
                Copyright © 2021, Reddy et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 October 2021
                Categories
                Anesthesiology
                Ophthalmology

                fentanyl,corneal epithelium,phenylephrine,lidocaine,cataract

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content856

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors291