19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of physical activity interventions on anthropometric indicators and health indices in Chilean children and adolescents: A protocol for systematic review and/or meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Introduction:

          Physical activity interventions have been a proven effective means of preventing or treating overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. The results of these interventions in many cases are based on the determination of the effect they produce on anthropometric evaluations, which allow the calculation of health indices. However, the effects of physical activity interventions on anthropometric assessments in Chilean children and adolescents have not been systematized. The objective of this study is to provide a detailed protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis that synthesizes the available evidence on the effect of physical activity interventions on anthropometric indicators and health indices in Chilean children and adolescents and identifies the field-based methods and health indices most used for body composition estimation.

          Methods:

          This protocol was performed according to the PRISMA declaration. MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Scielo databases will be systematically searched. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and pre-post studies.

          Conclusion:

          This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is designed to provide up-to-date evidence that could significantly assist public health policy makers and implementers of physical activity interventions through evidence-based guidance and recommendations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

              Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MD
                Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                26 May 2023
                26 May 2023
                : 102
                : 21
                : e33894
                Affiliations
                [a ] Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Chile, Grupo de investigación en Educación Física, Salud y Calidad de Vida, Pedagogía en Educación Física, Temuco, Chile
                [b ] Instituto del Deporte, Universidad de las Américas, Santiago, Chile
                [c ] Escuela de Educación Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
                [d ] Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Las Condes, Chile
                [e ] Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule (CIEAM), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile
                [f ] Laboratorio de Rendimiento Humano, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile
                [g ] Departamento de Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
                [h ] Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain
                [i ] Instituto Superior de Educación Física, Universidad de la República, Rivera, Uruguay.
                Author notes
                * Correspondence: Bruno Bizzozero Peroni, Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain (e-mail: bruno.bizzozero@ 123456uclm.es ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-5561
                Article
                00001
                10.1097/MD.0000000000033894
                10219749
                37233401
                73264bf0-982c-4ce0-aff5-c1eddc10f29c
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 April 2023
                : 9 May 2023
                : 10 May 2023
                Categories
                7000
                Research Article
                Study Protocol Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                anthropometric,chile,health,systematic review
                anthropometric, chile, health, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article