8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological–molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogeny

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Jawless, boneless, and virtually without fossil record, hagfish have long escaped systematists’ grip on their place among other fish. Yet their systematic resolution is critical to define vertebrates as a clade. Here we report an unequivocal fossil hagfish from the Cretaceous Mediterranean. Using this fossil to calibrate the evolutionary history of the group, our analysis supports hagfish and lampreys as sister groups, which likely diverged from one another in early Paleozoic times. As a result, vertebrates have a deep dichotomy, where some fossil jawless vertebrates sit closer to hagfish and lampreys than to jawed vertebrates. We showed that morphology-based analysis converged onto molecular inferences when characters are coded nonindependently, providing a case study for morphological–molecular conflicts in animal phylogeny.

          Abstract

          Hagfish depart so much from other fishes anatomically that they were sometimes considered not fully vertebrate. They may represent: ( i) an anatomically primitive outgroup of vertebrates (the morphology-based craniate hypothesis); or ( ii) an anatomically degenerate vertebrate lineage sister to lampreys (the molecular-based cyclostome hypothesis). This systematic conundrum has become a prominent case of conflict between morphology- and molecular-based phylogenies. To date, the fossil record has offered few insights to this long-branch problem or the evolutionary history of hagfish in general, because unequivocal fossil members of the group are unknown. Here, we report an unequivocal fossil hagfish from the early Late Cretaceous of Lebanon. The soft tissue anatomy includes key attributes of living hagfish: cartilages of barbels, postcranial position of branchial apparatus, and chemical traces of slime glands. This indicates that the suite of characters unique to living hagfish appeared well before Cretaceous times. This new hagfish prompted a reevaluation of morphological characters for interrelationships among jawless vertebrates. By addressing nonindependence of characters, our phylogenetic analyses recovered hagfish and lampreys in a clade of cyclostomes (congruent with the cyclostome hypothesis) using only morphological data. This new phylogeny places the fossil taxon within the hagfish crown group, and resolved other putative fossil cyclostomes to the stem of either hagfish or lamprey crown groups. These results potentially resolve the morphological–molecular conflict at the base of the Vertebrata. Thus, assessment of character nonindependence may help reconcile morphological and molecular inferences for other major discords in animal phylogeny.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          microRNAs reveal the interrelationships of hagfish, lampreys, and gnathostomes and the nature of the ancestral vertebrate.

          Hagfish and lampreys are the only living representatives of the jawless vertebrates (agnathans), and compared with jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes), they provide insight into the embryology, genomics, and body plan of the ancestral vertebrate. However, this insight has been obscured by controversy over their interrelationships. Morphological cladistic analyses have identified lampreys and gnathostomes as closest relatives, whereas molecular phylogenetic studies recover a monophyletic Cyclostomata (hagfish and lampreys as closest relatives). Here, we show through deep sequencing of small RNA libraries, coupled with genomic surveys, that Cyclostomata is monophyletic: hagfish and lampreys share 4 unique microRNA families, 15 unique paralogues of more primitive microRNA families, and 22 unique substitutions to the mature gene products. Reanalysis of morphological data reveals that support for cyclostome paraphyly was based largely on incorrect character coding, and a revised dataset is not decisive on the mono- vs. paraphyly of cyclostomes. Furthermore, we show fundamental conservation of microRNA expression patterns among lamprey, hagfish, and gnathostome organs, implying that the role of microRNAs within specific organs is coincident with their appearance within the genome and is conserved through time. Together, these data support the monophyly of cyclostomes and suggest that the last common ancestor of all living vertebrates was a more complex organism than conventionally accepted by comparative morphologists and developmental biologists.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data

            Different analytical methods can yield competing interpretations of evolutionary history and, currently, there is no definitive method for phylogenetic reconstruction using morphological data. Parsimony has been the primary method for analysing morphological data, but there has been a resurgence of interest in the likelihood-based Mk-model. Here, we test the performance of the Bayesian implementation of the Mk-model relative to both equal and implied-weight implementations of parsimony. Using simulated morphological data, we demonstrate that the Mk-model outperforms equal-weights parsimony in terms of topological accuracy, and implied-weights performs the most poorly. However, the Mk-model produces phylogenies that have less resolution than parsimony methods. This difference in the accuracy and precision of parsimony and Bayesian approaches to topology estimation needs to be considered when selecting a method for phylogeny reconstruction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A lamprey from the Devonian period of South Africa.

              Lampreys are the most scientifically accessible of the remaining jawless vertebrates, but their evolutionary history is obscure. In contrast to the rich fossil record of armoured jawless fishes, all of which date from the Devonian period and earlier, only two Palaeozoic lampreys have been recorded, both from the Carboniferous period. In addition to these, the recent report of an exquisitely preserved Lower Cretaceous example demonstrates that anatomically modern lampreys were present by the late Mesozoic era. Here we report a marine/estuarine fossil lamprey from the Famennian (Late Devonian) of South Africa, the identity of which is established easily because many of the key specializations of modern forms are already in place. These specializations include the first evidence of a large oral disc, the first direct evidence of circumoral teeth and a well preserved branchial basket. This small agnathan, Priscomyzon riniensis gen. et sp. nov., is not only more conventionally lamprey-like than other Palaeozoic examples, but is also some 35 million years older. This finding is evidence that agnathans close to modern lampreys had evolved before the end of the Devonian period. In this light, lampreys as a whole appear all the more remarkable: ancient specialists that have persisted as such and survived a subsequent 360 million years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                5 February 2019
                22 January 2019
                22 January 2019
                : 116
                : 6
                : 2146-2151
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago , Chicago, IL 60637;
                [2] bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta , Edmonton T6G 2E9, Canada;
                [3] cBlack Hills Institute of Geological Research , Hill City, SD 57745;
                [4] dSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester , M13 9PL Manchester, United Kingdom;
                [5] eStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory , Menlo Park, CA 94025;
                [6] fThe Children’s Museum of Indianapolis , Indianapolis, IN 46208
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: tetsuto@ 123456uchicago.edu .

                Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved December 14, 2018 (received for review August 28, 2018)

                Author contributions: T.M., A.R.P., and P.J.C. designed research; T.M. and M.I.C. performed research; T.M., R.F., P.L., P.L.M., R.A.W., N.P.E., J.A., and U.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; T.M., M.I.C., P.L.M., R.A.W., N.P.E., J.A., and U.B. analyzed data; R.F., P.L., and P.J.C. verified provenance; and T.M. wrote the paper with assistance from M.I.C., P.L.M., N.P.E., J.A., and A.R.P.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0050-4594
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-3899
                Article
                201814794
                10.1073/pnas.1814794116
                6369785
                30670644
                72da50e5-eacc-4db1-bce4-fdff7ab23b2a
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) 100000001
                Award ID: 0917922
                Award Recipient : Michael I Coates
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) 100000001
                Award ID: 1541491
                Award Recipient : Michael I Coates
                Funded by: National Science and Engineering Research Council
                Award ID: RGPIN 04863
                Award Recipient : A. Richard Palmer Award Recipient : Philip J. Currie
                Funded by: National Science and Engineering Research Council
                Award ID: RGPAS 462299
                Award Recipient : A. Richard Palmer Award Recipient : Philip J. Currie
                Funded by: National Science and Engineering Research Council
                Award ID: RGPIN 04715
                Award Recipient : A. Richard Palmer Award Recipient : Philip J. Currie
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Evolution
                Physical Sciences
                Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

                myxinoidea,cyclostome,monophyly,synchrotron,soft tissue
                myxinoidea, cyclostome, monophyly, synchrotron, soft tissue

                Comments

                Comment on this article