49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Carbon Cycle and Climate Change

          As climate change accelerates, it is important to know the likely impact of climate change on the carbon cycle (see the Perspective by [Related article:]Reich ). Gross primary production (GPP) is a measure of the amount of CO 2 removed from the atmosphere every year to fuel photosynthesis. Beer et al. (p. [Related article:]834 , published online 5 July) used a combination of observation and calculation to estimate that the total GPP by terrestrial plants is around 122 billion tons per year; in comparison, burning fossil fuels emits about 7 billion tons annually. Thirty-two percent of this uptake occurs in tropical forests, and precipitation controls carbon uptake in more than 40% of vegetated land. The temperature sensitivity (Q10) of ecosystem respiratory processes is a key determinant of the interaction between climate and the carbon cycle. Mahecha et al. (p. [Related article:]838 , published online 5 July) now show that the Q10 of ecosystem respiration is invariant with respect to mean annual temperature, independent of the analyzed ecosystem type, with a global mean value for Q10 of 1.6. This level of temperature sensitivity suggests a less-pronounced climate sensitivity of the carbon cycle than assumed by recent climate models.

          Abstract

          A combination of data and models provides an estimate of how much photosynthesis by all the world’s plants occurs each year.

          Abstract

          Terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) is the largest global CO 2 flux driving several ecosystem functions. We provide an observation-based estimate of this flux at 123 ± 8 petagrams of carbon per year (Pg C year −1 ) using eddy covariance flux data and various diagnostic models. Tropical forests and savannahs account for 60%. GPP over 40% of the vegetated land is associated with precipitation. State-of-the-art process-oriented biosphere models used for climate predictions exhibit a large between-model variation of GPP’s latitudinal patterns and show higher spatial correlations between GPP and precipitation, suggesting the existence of missing processes or feedback mechanisms which attenuate the vegetation response to climate. Our estimates of spatially distributed GPP and its covariation with climate can help improve coupled climate–carbon cycle process models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Solar Radiation and Productivity in Tropical Ecosystems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Science
                Science
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                August 13 2010
                August 13 2010
                : 329
                : 5993
                : 834-838
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biogeochemical Model-Data Integration Group, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany.
                [2 ]Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L’Environnement, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
                [3 ]Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia (FCT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
                [4 ]Biogeochemical Systems, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany.
                [5 ]McMaster Centre for Climate Change, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
                [6 ]Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management and Berkeley Atmospheric Science Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
                [7 ]National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
                [8 ]Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
                [9 ]Climate Change Unit, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
                [10 ]Department of Earth and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sweden.
                [11 ]Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
                [12 ]Departement Biologie, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium.
                [13 ]Centre d’étude de la forêt, Faculté de foresterie, de géographie et de géomatique, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
                [14 ]Cirad-Persyst, UPR80, Fonctionnement et Pilotage des Ecosystémes de Plantation, Montpellier, France.
                [15 ]CATIE (Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza), Turrialba, Costa Rica.
                [16 ]Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Netherlands.
                [17 ]Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA.
                [18 ]Department of Forest Environment and Resources, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
                Article
                10.1126/science.1184984
                20603496
                71d086e6-fb5d-472f-9227-420bb7d060f2
                © 2010
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article