5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PsyCARE study: assessing impact, cost-effectiveness, and transdiagnostic factors of the Italian ministry of health’s “psychological bonus” policy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders is surging worldwide, prompting a pressing demand for psychological interventions, especially in less severe cases. Responding to this need, the Italian government implemented the “Psychological Bonus” (PB) policy, allotting 25 million euros for mental health support. This policy entitles individuals to a minimum of four to twelve psychological sessions. In collaboration with the National Board of Italian Psychologists, our study assesses this policy’s effectiveness. Indeed, the PsyCARE study aims to examine the utilization of the Psychological Bonus, evaluate its impact on adult and adolescent participants’ psychological well-being through pre- and post-intervention assessments and six-month follow-up, and conduct a longitudinal cost-effectiveness analysis of this policy. A secondary aim is to investigate the influence of these interventions on transdiagnostic factors, including emotion regulation and epistemic trust.

          Methods

          The study involves licensed psychotherapists and their patients, both adults and adolescents, benefiting from the Psychological Bonus. Data collection is underway and set to conclude in December 2023. Psychotherapists will provide diagnostic information and assess patient functioning. In addition, patients will be evaluated on mental health aspects such as clinical symptoms, emotion regulation, epistemic trust, and quality of life. We will employ linear mixed-effects models to analyze the outcomes, accounting for both fixed and random effects to capture the hierarchical structure of the data.

          Discussion

          We anticipate the study’s findings will highlight reduced psychological distress and improved quality of life for participants and demonstrate the Psychological Bonus policy’s cost-effectiveness. The study will gather data on the role of specific versus nonspecific therapeutic factors in psychotherapy while adopting a patient-tailored approach to identify effective therapeutic elements and examine transdiagnostic factors. Overall, this study’s findings will guide future measures within the Italian healthcare system, fostering a psychological health culture and providing valuable insights to the broader public.

          Study registration

          https://osf.io/6zk2j

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A power primer.

          One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                laura.parolin@unimib.it
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                5 October 2023
                5 October 2023
                2023
                : 11
                : 306
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, ( https://ror.org/00s6t1f81) Pavia, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, ( https://ror.org/02mbd5571) Bergamo, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Science of Education, University of Catania, ( https://ror.org/03a64bh57) Catania, Italy
                [4 ]National Board of Italian Psychologists (CNOP), Rome, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, ( https://ror.org/02be6w209) Rome, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Psychology, University of Palermo, ( https://ror.org/044k9ta02) Palermo, Italy
                [7 ]GRID grid.7563.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2174 1754, Department of Psychology, , University of Milan-Bicocca, ; Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, Milan, 20126 Italy
                Article
                1345
                10.1186/s40359-023-01345-6
                10557166
                37798802
                70dc0317-8db5-4ba6-9c49-150e5550a592
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 27 June 2023
                : 25 September 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                psychological intervention,mental health,psychotherapy,psycare,transdiagnostic factors,epistemic trust,emotion regulation,effectiveness,anxiety,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article