28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Muscle precursor cells in the developing limbs of two isopods (Crustacea, Peracarida): an immunohistochemical study using a novel monoclonal antibody against myosin heavy chain

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 ,
      Development Genes and Evolution
      Springer-Verlag
      Muscle precursor, Isopoda, Crustacea, Appendage, Evolution

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the hot debate on arthropod relationships, Crustaceans and the morphology of their appendages play a pivotal role. To gain new insights into how arthropod appendages evolved, developmental biologists recently have begun to examine the expression and function of Drosophila appendage genes in Crustaceans. However, cellular aspects of Crustacean limb development such as myogenesis are poorly understood in Crustaceans so that the interpretative context in which to analyse gene functions is still fragmentary. The goal of the present project was to analyse muscle development in Crustacean appendages, and to that end, monoclonal antibodies against arthropod muscle proteins were generated. One of these antibodies recognises certain isoforms of myosin heavy chain and strongly binds to muscle precursor cells in malacostracan Crustacea. We used this antibody to study myogenesis in two isopods, Porcellio scaber and Idotea balthica (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida), by immunohistochemistry. In these animals, muscles in the limbs originate from single muscle precursor cells, which subsequently grow to form multinucleated muscle precursors. The pattern of primordial muscles in the thoracic limbs was mapped, and results compared to muscle development in other Crustaceans and in insects.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00427-008-0216-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references124

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology.

          A new and more robust evolutionary synthesis is emerging that attempts to explain macroevolution as well as microevolutionary events. This new synthesis emphasizes three morphological areas of biology that had been marginalized by the Modern Synthesis of genetics and evolution: embryology, macroevolution, and homology. The foundations for this new synthesis have been provided by new findings from developmental genetics and from the reinterpretation of the fossil record. In this nascent synthesis, macroevolutionary questions are not seen as being soluble by population genetics, and the developmental actions of genes involved with growth and cell specification are seen as being critical for the formation of higher taxa. In addition to discovering the remarkable homologies of homeobox genes and their domains of expression, developmental genetics has recently proposed homologies of process that supplement the older homologies of structure. Homologous developmental pathways, such those involving the wnt genes, are seen in numerous embryonic processes, and they are seen occurring in discrete regions, the morphogenetic fields. These fields (which exemplify the modular nature of developing embryos) are proposed to mediate between genotype and phenotype. Just as the cell (and not its genome) functions as the unit of organic structure and function, so the morphogenetic field (and not the genes or the cells) is seen as a major unit of ontogeny whose changes bring about changes in evolution.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression.

            Homeotic (Hox) genes specify the differential identity of segments along the body axis of insects. Changes in the segmental organization of arthropod bodies may therefore be driven by changes in the function of Hox genes, but so far this has been difficult to demonstrate. We show here that changes in the expression pattern of the Hox genes Ubx and AbdA in different crustaceans correlate well with the modification of their anterior thoracic limbs into feeding appendages (maxillipeds). Our observations provide direct evidence that major morphological changes in arthropod body plans are associated with changes in Hox gene regulation. They suggest that homeotic changes may play a role in the normal process of adaptive evolutionary change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolutionary origin of insect wings from ancestral gills.

              Two hypotheses have been proposed for the origin of insect wings. One holds that wings evolved by modification of limb branches that were already present in multibranched ancestral appendages and probably functioned as gills. The second proposes that wings arose as novel outgrowths of the body wall, not directly related to any pre-existing limbs. If wings derive from dorsal structures of multibranched appendages, we expect that some of their distinctive features will have been built on genetic functions that were already present in the structural progenitors of insect wings, and in homologous structures of other arthropod limbs. We have isolated crustacean homologues of two genes that have wing-specific functions in insects, pdm (nubbin) and apterous. Their expression patterns support the hypothesis that insect wings evolved from gill-like appendages that were already present in the aquatic ancestors of both crustaceans and insects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49-3641-571406 , +49-3641-571402 , sharzsch@ice.mpg.de
                Journal
                Dev Genes Evol
                Development Genes and Evolution
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0949-944X
                1432-041X
                29 April 2008
                May 2008
                : 218
                : 5
                : 253-265
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universität Konstanz, Fakultät für Biologie, Neurobiologie, 78434 Konstanz, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Beutenberg Campus, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germany
                Author notes

                Communicated by S. Roth

                Article
                216
                10.1007/s00427-008-0216-1
                2362136
                18443823
                706145dd-8de9-446c-b39a-481e55da7aeb
                © The Author(s) 2008
                History
                : 14 December 2007
                : 20 March 2008
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2008

                Developmental biology
                appendage,crustacea,muscle precursor,evolution,isopoda
                Developmental biology
                appendage, crustacea, muscle precursor, evolution, isopoda

                Comments

                Comment on this article