3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Racial-ethnic, gender identity, and sexual orientation disparities in COVID-19-related social and health outcomes: A decomposition analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the growing literature on racial-ethnic disparities during the pandemic, less is known about the explanatory mechanisms of these disparities and inequalities across other axes, such as gender and sexual identities. We studied the levels and sources of racial-ethnic, gender identity, and sexual minority disparities in social (i.e., unmet resource needs) and health (i.e., hospitalization) outcomes among individuals diagnosed with COVID-19, hypothesizing differential age structure, underlying health, and work and living arrangements as contributors to inequalities. Using large-scale administrative data from Chicago and adjusting for covariates, we found substantial racial-ethnic and gender identity disparities in both outcomes, and weak evidence of sexual minority disparities in unmet needs. Subsequent decomposition analyses revealed that living in larger households, having a higher share of non-adult cases, and facing higher burdens of chronic illness, obesity, and unemployment each statistically significantly drove racial-ethnic disparities in unmet needs, but these together explained less than 15% of the disparities. Similarly, about 20% of the Black-White gap in hospitalization resulted from disparities in underlying health and unemployment, whereas a higher proportion of non-adult cases or higher unemployment rates respectively proved the only significant pathways to partially explain transgender individuals’ disadvantages in unmet needs (12%) or hospitalization (6%). These findings highlight the importance of considering multiple dimensions of social differences in studying health disparities, the vulnerabilities of transgender and non-adult communities during the pandemic, and the valid yet quite limited roles of previously suggested sociodemographic factors in accounting for COVID-19-related categorical inequalities.

          Highlights

          • We assessed disparities by unmet needs and hospitalization among COVID-19 cases in Chicago.

          • We found stark racial-ethnic and gender identity—but not sexual—minority disparities.

          • Several factors statistically contributed to the gaps but with small effect size.

          • Underlying health, work and living conditions explained less than 10% of the gaps.

          • Minority groups' higher non-adult case load also drove disparities in unmet needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study

            Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a range of negative social and economic effects that may contribute to a rise in mental health problems. In this observational population-based study, we examined longitudinal changes in the prevalence of mental health problems from before to during the COVID-19 crisis and identified subgroups that are psychologically vulnerable during the pandemic. Methods Participants (N = 14 393; observations = 48 486) were adults drawn from wave 9 (2017–2019) of the nationally representative United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) and followed-up across three waves of assessment in April, May, and June 2020. Mental health problems were assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Results The population prevalence of mental health problems (GHQ-12 score ⩾3) increased by 13.5 percentage points from 24.3% in 2017–2019 to 37.8% in April 2020 and remained elevated in May (34.7%) and June (31.9%) 2020. All sociodemographic groups examined showed statistically significant increases in mental health problems in April 2020. The increase was largest among those aged 18–34 years (18.6 percentage points, 95% CI 14.3–22.9%), followed by females and high-income and education groups. Levels of mental health problems subsequently declined between April and June 2020 but remained significantly above pre-COVID-19 levels. Additional analyses showed that the rise in mental health problems observed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic was unlikely to be due to seasonality or year-to-year variation. Conclusions This study suggests that a pronounced and prolonged deterioration in mental health occurred as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in the UK between April and June 2020.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Association of Social and Demographic Factors With COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates in the US

              Key Points Question Are population-level social factors associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) incidence and mortality? Findings In this cross-sectional study including 4 289 283 COVID-19 cases and 147 074 COVID-19 deaths, county-level sociodemographic risk factors as assessed by the Social Vulnerability Index were associated with greater COVID-19 incidence and mortality. Meaning These findings suggest that to address inequities in the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic, these sociodemographic risk factors and their root causes must be addressed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM - Population Health
                Elsevier
                2352-8273
                23 July 2023
                September 2023
                23 July 2023
                : 23
                : 101474
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Sociology, Cornell University, Chicago Department of Public Health, USA
                [b ]Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago Department of Public Health, USA
                [c ]Chicago Department of Public Health, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. 345 Uris Hall, Ithaca NY 14850, USA. xy364@ 123456cornell.edu
                Article
                S2352-8273(23)00139-8 101474
                10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101474
                10407278
                6f4d003f-39a8-412e-940f-27eec711197c

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 April 2023
                : 21 July 2023
                : 21 July 2023
                Categories
                Regular Article

                health inequality,covid-19,unmet resource needs,gender and sexual minority,khb-method

                Comments

                Comment on this article