3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of a behaviour change intervention to promote sanitation and latrine use in rural India

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Across developing countries poor sanitation is associated with disease often found widespread in rural populations.

          Objectives

          This objective of this study was to conduct a formative research and feasibility evaluation of the behavioural intervention designed to improve latrine use in rural India.

          Methods

          Study conducted in four villages of Rajasthan, where latrine use is low and open defecation may spread disease. To identify the intervention a literature review was conducted, a survey of 497 households, and focus groups in village households (8–10 women and children). Seven focus groups with 63 women were conducted. Based on the survey results, the behaviour change intervention is developed utilising the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-behaviour model and MINDSPACE framework. One intervention component involves psychological aspects that engage villagers through a pledge; the other component is provision of small incentives to facilitate latrine use. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was examined in the study population. The 30-day intervention was delivered to women in 38 randomly selected households who despite having a functional latrine did not use it. Thematic analysis, binary logistic regression analysis and feasibility evaluation of the intervention conducted. Post-intervention feedback from 22 participating households was obtained.

          Results

          The piloted intervention was feasible and so a revised design is offered. Results driving this evaluation include barriers identified, and used to improved intervention design in the current study. Village authority figures influenced behaviours across the villages and so did factors of convenience (β = 5.28, p < 0.01), relief (β = 5.49, p < 0.01), comfort (β = 2.36, p < 0.01), Construction cost (β=-1.98, p < 0.01) and safety (β = 2.93, p < 0.01) were significant concerns associated with latrine use in the context of prevalent OD in the region. The logistic regression baseline model for the dependant variables indicated a significant increase in latrine use. Based on the feasibility study, the intervention is refined in several ways.

          Conclusions

          Our theory-driven approach improves latrine use in Rajasthan and offers a useful tool to facilitate hygiene behaviour.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-17061-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials

          Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are increasingly popular in the social sciences, not only in medicine. We argue that the lay public, and sometimes researchers, put too much trust in RCTs over other methods of investigation. Contrary to frequent claims in the applied literature, randomization does not equalize everything other than the treatment in the treatment and control groups, it does not automatically deliver a precise estimate of the average treatment effect (ATE), and it does not relieve us of the need to think about (observed or unobserved) covariates. Finding out whether an estimate was generated by chance is more difficult than commonly believed. At best, an RCT yields an unbiased estimate, but this property is of limited practical value. Even then, estimates apply only to the sample selected for the trial, often no more than a convenience sample, and justification is required to extend the results to other groups, including any population to which the trial sample belongs, or to any individual, including an individual in the trial. Demanding ‘external validity’ is unhelpful because it expects too much of an RCT while undervaluing its potential contribution. RCTs do indeed require minimal assumptions and can operate with little prior knowledge. This is an advantage when persuading distrustful audiences, but it is a disadvantage for cumulative scientific progress, where prior knowledge should be built upon, not discarded. RCTs can play a role in building scientific knowledge and useful predictions but they can only do so as part of a cumulative program, combining with other methods, including conceptual and theoretical development, to discover not ‘what works’, but ‘why things work’.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Sanitation-related psychosocial stress: A grounded theory study of women across the life-course in Odisha, India.

              While sanitation interventions have focused primarily on child health, women's unique health risks from inadequate sanitation are gaining recognition as a priority issue. This study examines the range of sanitation-related psychosocial stressors during routine sanitation practices in Odisha, India. Between August 2013 and March 2014, we conducted in-depth interviews with 56 women in four life stages: adolescent, newly married, pregnant and established adult women in three settings: urban slums, rural villages and indigenous villages. Using a grounded theory approach, the study team transcribed, translated, coded and discussed interviews using detailed analytic memos to identify and characterize stressors at each life stage and study site. We found that sanitation practices encompassed more than defecation and urination and included carrying water, washing, bathing, menstrual management, and changing clothes. During the course of these activities, women encountered three broad types of stressors-environmental, social, and sexual-the intensity of which were modified by the woman's life stage, living environment, and access to sanitation facilities. Environmental barriers, social factors and fears of sexual violence all contributed to sanitation-related psychosocial stress. Though women responded with small changes to sanitation practices, they were unable to significantly modify their circumstances, notably by achieving adequate privacy for sanitation-related behaviors. A better understanding of the range of causes of stress and adaptive behaviors is needed to inform context-specific, gender-sensitive sanitation interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ivo.vlaev@wbs.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                6 November 2023
                6 November 2023
                2023
                : 23
                : 2176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, ( https://ror.org/027m9bs27) Manchester, M13 9PL UK
                [2 ]Behavioural Insights Team, ( https://ror.org/03mk5b468) 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP UK
                [3 ]Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, ( https://ror.org/01a77tt86) Scarman Rd, Coventry, CV4 7A UK
                Article
                17061
                10.1186/s12889-023-17061-0
                10629081
                37932758
                6e5eaff8-6037-41a1-9215-07c90df5008a
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 26 March 2023
                : 24 October 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: The Behavioural Insights Team
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Public health
                latrine use,open defecation,rural perceptions,behaviour change intervention
                Public health
                latrine use, open defecation, rural perceptions, behaviour change intervention

                Comments

                Comment on this article