14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ethical and methodological issues in qualitative studies involving people with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions: a critical review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Undertaking research studies in the field of mental health is essential in mental health nursing. Qualitative research methodologies enable human experiences to become visible and recognize the importance of lived experiences. This paper argues that involving people with schizophrenia in research is critical to promote their health and well-being. The quality of qualitative research needs scrutinizing according to methodological issues such as trustworthiness and ethical standards that are a fundamental part of qualitative research and nursing curricula. The aim of this study was to critically review recent qualitative studies involving people with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions, regarding descriptions of ethical and methodological issues in data collection and analysis. A search for relevant papers was conducted in three electronic databases, in December 2016. Fifteen qualitative interview studies were included and reviewed regarding methodological issues related to ethics, and data collection and analysis. The results revealed insufficient descriptions of methodology regarding ethical considerations and issues related to recruitment and sampling in qualitative interview studies with individuals with severe mental illness, putting trustworthiness at risk despite detailed descriptions of data analysis. Knowledge from the perspective of individuals with their own experience of mental illness is essential. Issues regarding sampling and trustworthiness in qualitative studies involving people with severe mental illness are vital to counteract the stigmatization of mental illness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mental Health Stigma as Social Attribution: Implications for Research Methods and Attitude Change

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research.

            When healthcare professionals or other involved parties prevent eligible patients from entering a trial as a research subject, they are gatekeeping. This phenomenon is a persistent problem in palliative care research and thought to be responsible for the failure of many studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mental health professionals' attitudes towards people with mental illness: do they differ from attitudes held by people with mental illness?

              Studies investigating mental health professionals' attitudes towards people with mental illness are scarce and there is a lack of comparative studies including both patients' and mental health professionals' attitudes. The aim of the present study was to investigate mental health staff's attitudes towards people with mental illness and compare these with the attitudes of patients in contact with mental health services. A further aim was to relate staff attitudes to demographic and work characteristics. A cross-sectional study was performed including 140 staff and 141 patients. The study included a random sample of outpatients in contact with mental health services in the southern part of Sweden and staff working in these services. Attitudes were investigated using a questionnaire covering beliefs of devaluation and discrimination of people with a mental illness. Negative attitudes were prevalent among staff. Most negative attitudes concerned whether an employer would accept an application for work, willingness to date a person who had been hospitalized, and hiring a patient to take care of children. Staff treating patients with a psychosis or working in inpatient settings had the most negative attitudes. Patient attitudes were overall similar to staff attitudes and there were significant differences in only three out of 12 dimensions. Patients' most negative attitudes were in the same area as the staff's. This study points to the suggestion that mental health care staff may hold negative attitudes and beliefs about people with mental illness with tentative implications for treatment of the patient and development and implementation of evidence-based services. Since patients and staff in most respects share these beliefs, it is essential to develop interventions that have an impact on both patients and staff, enabling a more recovery-oriented staff-patient relationship.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being
                Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being
                ZQHW
                zqhw20
                International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
                Taylor & Francis
                1748-2623
                1748-2631
                2017
                13 September 2017
                : 12
                : sup2 , Thematic cluster: Perspectives on power relations in human health and well-being
                : 1368323
                Affiliations
                [ a ] School of Health and Welfare, Department of Health and Nursing, Halmstad University , Halmstad, Sweden
                Author notes
                CONTACT Ing-Marie Carlsson ing-marie.carlsson@ 123456hh.se School of Social and Health Sciences, Halmstad University , SE-823, SE-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden
                Article
                1368323
                10.1080/17482631.2017.1368323
                5654012
                28901217
                6de7652a-ebec-47d1-b054-8951e8b32e1e
                © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 29, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Article
                Article for Thematic Cluster

                Health & Social care
                critical review,ethical issues,mental health,schizophrenia,trustworthiness
                Health & Social care
                critical review, ethical issues, mental health, schizophrenia, trustworthiness

                Comments

                Comment on this article