2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An exploration of prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy: a scoping review protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To synthesise the evidence on prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy, including identifying concepts and theoretical frameworks that underpin its development, the evidence on its measurement, interventions used to improve it, and association with breastfeeding outcomes.

          Background: Breastfeeding self-efficacy is described as a woman’s self-belief and confidence in her perceived ability to breastfeed. It is a modifiable measure that is strongly associated with breastfeeding outcomes such as initiation, exclusivity, and duration. Interventions aimed at increasing self-efficacy are often in the postnatal period and have been shown to be effective at improving breastfeeding outcomes. The prenatal period appears to be underexplored in the literature and yet focusing on enhancing it may have the potential for further improvements in self-efficacy and on subsequent breastfeeding outcomes. A comprehensive knowledge synthesis on prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy is lacking.

          Methods: The search will include databases across health, psychology, sociology, and the grey literature on breastfeeding guidance. Once the PCC framework (Problem: breastfeeding, Concept: self-efficacy, Context: prenatal period) is met, sources of evidence from any contextual setting will be eligible for inclusion. Limits will not be applied on geographic location or year of publication. The PRISMA-ScR flow diagram of search and study selection will be used to report final figures. Two independent reviewers will perform title and abstract screening and full text review. Data will be charted to provide a logical and descriptive summary of the results that align with the objectives.

          Conclusion: The results will provide an understanding of what has been done in the space and what gaps exist, informing recommendations for the timing of measurement and the design of prenatal interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

            Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Open Res Eur
                Open Res Eur
                Open Research Europe
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2732-5121
                24 January 2023
                2022
                : 2
                : 91
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland
                [2 ]UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2, D02 YH21, Ireland
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
                University College Dublin, Ireland
                [1 ]School of Health and Social Care, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                [1 ]School of Health and Social Care, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                University College Dublin, Ireland
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
                University College Dublin, Ireland
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-9940
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3547-6634
                Article
                10.12688/openreseurope.14938.3
                10445816
                37645344
                6cc199e6-c3ff-4939-8c58-13b6e8b875ae
                Copyright: © 2023 McGovern L et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
                Award ID: 847984
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council collaborative grant scheme funding, Australia
                Award ID: GNT1194234
                This research was financially supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No [847984] (Implementation Action to Prevent Diabetes from Bump 2 Baby [IMPACT DIABETES B2B]), with National Health and Medical Research Council collaborative grant scheme funding GNT1194234 and coordinated by SOR.
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Articles

                breastfeeding,lactation,prenatal,antenatal,self-efficacy,self-belief

                Comments

                Comment on this article