2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study : PREVALENCE OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER SYMPTOMS

      , , , , ,
      BJU International
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence of urinary incontinence.

          The prevalence of urinary incontinence was investigated by determining the number of incontinent patients under the care of various health and social service agencies in two London boroughs and by a postal survey of the 22 430 people aged 5 years and over on the practice lists of 12 general practitioners in different parts of the country. The prevalence of incontinence known to the health and social service agencies was 0.2% in women and 0.1% in men aged 15-64 and 2.5% in women and 1.3% in men aged 65 and over. The postal survey, to which 89% of the people whose correct address was known replied, showed a prevalence of urinary incontinence of 8.5% in women and 1.6% in men aged 15-64 and 11.6% in women and 6.9% in men aged 65 and over. Nulliparous women had a lower prevalence than those who had had one, two, or three babies, but within the parity range of one to three there were no differences in prevalence. The prevalence was appreciably increased in women who had had four or more babies. Incontinence was moderate or severe in a fifth of those who reported it in the postal survey, of whom less than a third were receiving health or social services for the condition. Incontinence is a common symptom, and many unrecognised cases appear to exist. There may be considerable scope for improving its management.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women.

            The influence of age, parity, duration of previous oral contraceptive use, hysterectomy and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence was evaluated by means of a postal questionnaire in women 46 to 86 years old who resided in the city of Göteborg, Sweden. A sample of 10,000 women from the 7 birth cohorts of 1900 to 1940 was obtained at random from the population register. The overall response rate was 74.6%. The prevalence of urinary incontinence increased (p < 0.001) in a linear fashion from 12.1% in the 1940 birth cohort to 24.6% in the 1900 birth cohort. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous women was 7.7% in the 1930 birth cohort and 5.5% in the 1940 birth cohort. The corresponding figures for women who had experienced 1 delivery were 11.1% and 10.6%, compared to 14.0% and 16.4% among women who had had 3 or more deliveries. Urinary incontinence was more prevalent in women who had undergone hysterectomy (p < 0.05). The prevalence of urinary incontinence was unaffected by the duration of previous oral contraceptive use and there was no evidence to suggest that the prevalence of urinary incontinence increased at the time of the last menstrual period.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BJU International
                Wiley
                14644096
                1464410X
                June 2001
                January 12 2002
                : 87
                : 9
                : 760-766
                Article
                10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02228.x
                6aac43f8-4fa0-4095-885d-dd868f09784e
                © 2002

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article