<p id="P3">Antibodies are promising post-exposure therapies against emerging viruses,
but which
antibody features and
<i>in vitro</i> assays best forecast protection are unclear. Our international consortium
systematically
evaluated antibodies against Ebola virus (EBOV) using multidisciplinary assays. For
each antibody, we evaluated epitopes recognized on the viral surface glycoprotein
(GP) and secreted glycoprotein (sGP), readouts of multiple neutralization assays,
fraction of virions left un-neutralized, glycan structures, phagocytic and natural
killer cell functions elicited, and
<i>in vivo</i> protection in a mouse challenge model. Neutralization and induction
of multiple immune
effector functions (IEFs) correlated most strongly with protection. Neutralization
predominantly occurred via epitopes maintained on endosomally cleaved GP, whereas
maximal IEF mapped to epitopes farthest from the viral membrane. Unexpectedly, sGP
cross-reactivity did not significantly influence
<i>in vivo</i> protection. This comprehensive dataset provides a rubric to evaluate
novel antibodies
and vaccine responses and a roadmap for therapeutic development for EBOV and related
viruses.
</p><p id="P4">The systematic assessment of the effector functions and binding sites
of antibodies
against Ebola virus provides a generalizable framework to evaluate the determinants
of antibody-mediate protection in viral disease.
</p><p id="P5">
<div class="figure-container so-text-align-c">
<img alt="" class="figure" src="/document_file/809a267b-892d-4def-b21e-42506227ae2d/PubMedCentral/image/nihms1502951u1.jpg"/>
</div>
</p>