19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sociodemographic Characteristics and Comorbidities of Patients With Long COVID and Persistent Olfactory Dysfunction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with long COVID and persistent olfactory dysfunction?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study of 219 patients with long COVID and neurologic symptoms, 64% had olfactory dysfunction, with the highest prevalence among women, adults, and outpatients. Patients with olfactory dysfunction may develop severe olfactory loss (hyposmia or anosmia) that may persist for more than 1 year after the onset of symptoms.

          Meaning

          This study suggests that olfactory dysfunction in patients with long COVID may become permanent.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Determining the characteristics, type, and severity of olfactory dysfunction in patients with long COVID is important for the prognosis and potential treatment of the affected population.

          Objective

          To describe the sociodemographic and clinical features of patients with long COVID who develop persistent olfactory dysfunction.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study, conducted at a rehabilitation center at a public university in the Amazon region of Brazil between September 9, 2020, and October 20, 2021, comprised 219 patients with long COVID and self-reported neurologic symptoms. Of these 219 patients, 139 received a diagnosis of chronic olfactory dysfunction, as confirmed by the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test.

          Exposure

          Clinical diagnosis of long COVID.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Electronic case report forms were prepared for the collection of sociodemographic and clinical data. Patients’ sense of smell was evaluated via a CCCRC test, and the association of olfactory dysfunction with aspects of daily life was recorded using a questionnaire.

          Results

          Of the 219 patients included in the study, 164 (74.9%) were women, 194 (88.6%) were between 18 and 59 years of age (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [12.9] years), 206 (94.1%) had more than 9 years of education, and 115 (52.5%) had a monthly income of up to US $192.00. In the study group, 139 patients (63.5%) had some degree of olfactory dysfunction, whereas 80 patients (36.5%) had normosmia. Patients with olfactory dysfunction had a significantly longer duration of long COVID symptoms than those in the normosmia group (mean [SD], 242.7 [101.9] vs 221.0 [97.5] days; P = .01). Among patients with anosmia, there was a significant association between olfactory dysfunction and daily activities, especially in terms of impairment in hazard detection (21 of 31 patients [67.7%]), personal hygiene (21 of 31 patients [67.7%]), and food intake (21 of 31 patients [67.7%]). Univariable logistic regression analyses found that ageusia symptoms were associated with the occurrence of olfactory dysfunction (odds ratio [OR], 11.14 [95% CI, 4.76-26.07]; P < .001), whereas headache (OR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22-0.76]; P < .001) and sleep disorders (OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.26-0.92]; P = .02) showed an inverse association with the occurrence of olfactory dysfunction.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Olfactory dysfunction is one of the most important long-term neurologic symptoms of COVID-19, with the highest prevalence seen among women, adults, and outpatients. Patients with olfactory dysfunction may experience persistent severe hyposmia or anosmia more than 1 year from the onset of symptoms, suggesting the possibility of the condition becoming a permanent sequela.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study describes the sociodemographic and clinical features of patients with long COVID who develop persistent olfactory dysfunction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

            Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pathogen responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has resulted in global healthcare crises and strained health resources. As the population of patients recovering from COVID-19 grows, it is paramount to establish an understanding of the healthcare issues surrounding them. COVID-19 is now recognized as a multi-organ disease with a broad spectrum of manifestations. Similarly to post-acute viral syndromes described in survivors of other virulent coronavirus epidemics, there are increasing reports of persistent and prolonged effects after acute COVID-19. Patient advocacy groups, many members of which identify themselves as long haulers, have helped contribute to the recognition of post-acute COVID-19, a syndrome characterized by persistent symptoms and/or delayed or long-term complications beyond 4 weeks from the onset of symptoms. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on post-acute COVID-19, its pathophysiology and its organ-specific sequelae. Finally, we discuss relevant considerations for the multidisciplinary care of COVID-19 survivors and propose a framework for the identification of those at high risk for post-acute COVID-19 and their coordinated management through dedicated COVID-19 clinics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              COVID-19 can involve persistence, sequelae, and other medical complications that last weeks to months after initial recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify studies assessing the long-term effects of COVID-19. LitCOVID and Embase were searched to identify articles with original data published before the 1st of January 2021, with a minimum of 100 patients. For effects reported in two or more studies, meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed using the MetaXL software to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% CI. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A total of 18,251 publications were identified, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of 55 long-term effects was estimated, 21 meta-analyses were performed, and 47,910 patients were included (age 17–87 years). The included studies defined long-COVID as ranging from 14 to 110 days post-viral infection. It was estimated that 80% of the infected patients with SARS-CoV-2 developed one or more long-term symptoms. The five most common symptoms were fatigue (58%), headache (44%), attention disorder (27%), hair loss (25%), and dyspnea (24%). Multi-disciplinary teams are crucial to developing preventive measures, rehabilitation techniques, and clinical management strategies with whole-patient perspectives designed to address long COVID-19 care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                8 September 2022
                September 2022
                8 September 2022
                : 5
                : 9
                : e2230637
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Tropical Medicine Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil
                [2 ]Biological and Health Center, Pará State University, Belém, Brazil
                [3 ]Biological Science Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil
                [4 ]Cosmopolita College, Belém, Brazil
                [5 ]University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 15, 2022.
                Published: September 8, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30637
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Mendes Paranhos AC et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Luiz Fábio Magno Falcão, PhD, Biological and Health Center, Pará State University, 2623, Perebebui St, Belém, PA, Brazil ( fabiofalcao@ 123456uepa.br ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Magno Falcão had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Souza, Simões Quaresma, and Magno Falcão share senior authorship.
                Concept and design: Mendes Paranhos, Nazareth Dias, Vieira Hennemann Koury, Cerasi, Souza, Simões Quaresma, Magno Falcão.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Mendes Paranhos, Nazareth Dias, Machado da Silva, Vieira Hennemann Koury, de Jesus Sousa, Cerasi, Souza, Magno Falcão.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Mendes Paranhos, Nazareth Dias, Machado da Silva, Cerasi, Souza, Simões Quaresma, Magno Falcão.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mendes Paranhos, Nazareth Dias, Vieira Hennemann Koury, de Jesus Sousa, Cerasi, Souza, Magno Falcão.
                Statistical analysis: Mendes Paranhos, Nazareth Dias, Vieira Hennemann Koury, Souza, Magno Falcão.
                Obtained funding: Simões Quaresma.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Vieira Hennemann Koury, Cerasi.
                Supervision: Souza, Simões Quaresma.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisa (FAPESPA 006/2020), Secretaria de Estado de Ciência, Tecnologia e Educação Técnica e Tecnológica (SECTET 09/2021), and Coordination for the improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES PDPG AMAZÔNIA LEGAL).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: The authors thank all of the patients who agreed to voluntarily participate in this study and the pharmacology laboratory of Cosmopolita College for the development of Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test solutions used in the data collection.
                Article
                zoi220868
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30637
                9459661
                36074464
                689a1e20-7d3f-4c5d-8031-9e2139ea9df3
                Copyright 2022 Mendes Paranhos AC et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 9 May 2022
                : 15 July 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Infectious Diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article