24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or SOFA score was developed to assess the acute morbidity of critical illness at a population level and has been widely validated as a tool for this purpose across a range of healthcare settings and environments.

          In recent years, the SOFA score has become extensively used in a range of other applications. A change in the SOFA score of 2 or more is now a defining characteristic of the sepsis syndrome, and the European Medicines Agency has accepted that a change in the SOFA score is an acceptable surrogate marker of efficacy in exploratory trials of novel therapeutic agents in sepsis. The requirement to detect modest serial changes in a patients’ SOFA score therefore means that increased clarity on how the score should be assessed in different circumstances is required.

          This review explores the development of the SOFA score, its applications and the challenges associated with measurement. In addition, it proposes guidance designed to facilitate the consistent and valid assessment of the score in multicentre sepsis trials involving novel therapeutic agents or interventions.

          Conclusion

          The SOFA score is an increasingly important tool in defining both the clinical condition of the individual patient and the response to therapies in the context of clinical trials. Standardisation between different assessors in widespread centres is key to detecting response to treatment if the SOFA score is to be used as an outcome in sepsis clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

          Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

            To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012".
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

              The Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force defined sepsis as "life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection." The performance of clinical criteria for this sepsis definition is unknown.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                b.francois@unilim.fr
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                27 November 2019
                27 November 2019
                2019
                : 23
                : 374
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, , University of Cambridge, ; Cambridge, CB20Q UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2294 713X, GRID grid.7942.8, St Luc University Hospital, , Université Catholique de Louvain, ; Avenue Hippocrate 12, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9094, GRID grid.40263.33, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School, , Brown University, ; Providence, RI USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1481 5225, GRID grid.412212.6, Intensive care unit & Inserm CIC 1435 & Inserm UMR 1092, , Dupuytren University Hospital, ; Limoges, France
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1652
                Article
                2663
                10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7
                6880479
                31775846
                686f1cb7-968c-49c1-8572-f25fb2b82596
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 1 July 2019
                : 29 October 2019
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                sepsis,sequential organ failure assessment,sofa,clinical trials,surrogate endpoints,critical care trials,multiple organ failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article