19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High time resolution observations of the January 2000 glitch in the Vela pulsar

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pulsars are rotating neutron stars, sweeping the emission regions from the magnetic poles across our line of sight. Isolated neutron stars lose angular momentum through dipole radiation and (possibly) particle winds, hence they slow down extremely steadily, making them amongst the most reliable timing sources available. However, it is well known that younger pulsars can suffer glitches, when they suddenly deviate from their stable rotation period. On 2000 January 16 (MJD 51559) the rate of pulsation from the Vela pulsar (B0833-45) showed such a fractional period change of {\rm \(3.1\times 10^{-6}\)}, the largest recorded for this pulsar. The glitch was detected and reported by the Hobart radio telescope. The speedy announcement allowed the X-ray telescope, Chandra, and others, to make Target of Opportunity observations. The data placed an upper limit of 40 seconds for the transition time from the original to the new period. Four relaxation timescales are found, which are believed to be due to the variable coupling between the crust and the interior fluid. One is very short, about 60 seconds; the others have been previously reported and are 0.56, 3.33 and 19.1 days in length.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          02 January 2002
          Article
          10.1086/339068
          astro-ph/0201005
          68000908-76f8-4941-9507-0b17090a9e7e
          History
          Custom metadata
          Accepted in ApJL
          astro-ph

          Comments

          Comment on this article