There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Opportunities for international humanitarian missions are highly sought after
by medical students, residents, and attending plastic surgeons. The educational benefits
and ethical considerations of trainees participating in these ventures have been debated.
Currently, many surgical training programs do not have the necessary infrastructure
to support missions of this sort, though resident interest in these experiences have
been increasing. The perceived benefit and value of international work have not yet
been well evaluated. In this study, we evaluate surgical residents’ perspectives on
the personal and educational benefits of international mission work.
METHODS: A 24-item online questionnaire was designed to measure residents’ perspectives
on humanitarian missions and potential educational benefits. Residents’ perceptions
on how participation in these missions may have influenced their career path were
also evaluated. This questionnaire was disseminated to the plastic surgery residents
in accredited programs in the United States during the 2015–2016 academic year.
RESULTS: 123 responses were collected. Of these, 49 (40%) indicated they had participated
in international mission work prior to beginning residency, while 74 (60%) had not.
Of those who had participated, 57% (n=25) agreed that this experience impacted their
choice to pursue plastic surgery as a specialty. Twenty-nine (24%) participated in
one or more missions during residency. The most common type of mission work focused
on cleft lip/palate repairs (n=24) followed by non-surgical medical relief (n=18)
and general plastics/combined (n=6). Most respondents reported trips lasting 6–8 days
(n=29, 48%), though several reported trips that lasted 9–10 days (n=6, 10%) and 11
days or more (n=16, 27%). When asked about the volume of cases performed, 32 (65%)
reported participating in more than 15 cases, with 15 (31%) residents reporting participation
in 26 cases or more. When asked to evaluate the educational benefits in light of the
six core competencies from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education,
there was an overwhelmingly positive response.
CONCLUSION: Residents perceive international mission experiences to be valuable for
professional development as well as an effective tool for surgical education, particularly
in the setting of competency-based education goals and these ventures should be supported
by training programs. An appropriately planned mission experience can impact the professional
and educational development of the trainee.