23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      MSmonitor-plus program and video calling care (MPVC) for multidisciplinary care and self-management in multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a single-center randomized, parallel-group, open label, non-inferiority trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We designed a new multi-modal version of the MSmonitor, called the MSmonitor-Plus and Video calling Care (MPVC), a self-management and education program with e-health interventions that combines frequent use of specific questionnaires with video calling in treating multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

          Objective

          To assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of MPVC compared to care as usual (CAU), with the goal of achieving equal or better quality of life for MS patients and their partners/informal caregivers.

          Our hypothesis is that by using MPVC, monitoring will become more efficient, that patients’ self-efficacy, quality of life, and adherence to treatment will improve, and that they will be able to live their lives more autonomously.

          Methods

          A randomized, parallel-group, open label, non-inferiority trial will be conducted to compare MPVC with CAU in MS patients and their partners/informal caregivers. A total of 208 patients will be included with follow-up measurements for 2 years (at baseline and every 3 months). One hundred four patients will be randomized to MPVC and 104 patients to CAU. Partners/informal caregivers of both groups will be asked to participate.

          The study will consist of three parts: 1) a clinical effectiveness study, 2) an economic evaluation, and 3) a process evaluation. The primary outcome relates to equal or improved disease-specific physical and mental quality of life of the MS patients. Secondary outcomes relate to self-efficacy, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, autonomy, satisfaction with the care provided, and quality of life of partners/informal caregivers.

          Discussion

          The idea behind using MPVC is that MS patients will gain more insight into the individual course of the disease and get a better grip on their symptoms. This knowledge should increase their autonomy, give patients more control of their condition and enable them to better and proactively interact with health care professionals.

          As the consulting process becomes more efficient with the use of MPVC, MS-related problems could be detected earlier, enabling earlier multidisciplinary care, treatment or modification of the treatment. This could have a positive effect on the quality of life for both the MS patient and his/her partner/informal caregiver, reducing health and social costs.

          Trial registration

          NCT05242731 Clinical Trials.gov. Date of registration: 16 February 2022 retrospectively registered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.

          To review the literature of the validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A review of the 747 identified papers that used HADS was performed to address the following questions: (I) How are the factor structure, discriminant validity and the internal consistency of HADS? (II) How does HADS perform as a case finder for anxiety disorders and depression? (III) How does HADS agree with other self-rating instruments used to rate anxiety and depression? Most factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor solution in good accordance with the HADS subscales for Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D), respectively. The correlations between the two subscales varied from.40 to.74 (mean.56). Cronbach's alpha for HADS-A varied from.68 to.93 (mean.83) and for HADS-D from.67 to.90 (mean.82). In most studies an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved when caseness was defined by a score of 8 or above on both HADS-A and HADS-D. The sensitivity and specificity for both HADS-A and HADS-D of approximately 0.80 were very similar to the sensitivity and specificity achieved by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Correlations between HADS and other commonly used questionnaires were in the range.49 to.83. HADS was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future

            Over the period 1987–1991 an inter-disciplinary five-country group developed the EuroQol instrument, a five-dimensional three-level generic measure subsequently termed the ‘EQ-5D’. It was designed to measure and value health status. The salient features of its development and its consolidation and expansion are discussed. Initial expansion came, in particular, in the form of new language versions. Their development raised translation and semantic issues, experience with which helped feed into the design of two further instruments, the EQ-5D-5L and the youth version EQ-5D-Y. The expanded usage across clinical programmes, disease and condition areas, population surveys, patient-reported outcomes, and value sets is outlined. Valuation has been of continued relevance for the Group as this has allowed its instruments to be utilised as part of the economic appraisal of health programmes and their incorporation into health technology assessments. The future of the Group is considered in the context of: (1) its scientific strategy, (2) changes in the external environment affecting the demand for EQ-5D, and (3) a variety of issues it is facing in the context of the design of the instrument, its use in health technology assessment, and potential new uses for EQ-5D outside of clinical trials and technology appraisal. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.

              In 2009, a new version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) was introduced with five rather than three answer levels per dimension. This instrument is known as the EQ-5D-5L. To make the EQ-5D-5L suitable for use in economic evaluations, societal values need to be attached to all 3125 health states.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.hoving@isala.nl
                Journal
                BMC Neurol
                BMC Neurol
                BMC Neurology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2377
                12 November 2022
                12 November 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 423
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, , Isala Hospital, ; Zwolle, the Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.5012.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0481 6099, Department of Health Services Research (HRS), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), , Maastricht University, ; Maastricht, the Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.491359.3, MS4 Research Institute, ; Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.4494.d, ISNI 0000 0000 9558 4598, Department of Health Sciences, , University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, ; Groningen, the Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.416017.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0835 8259, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Centre of Economic Evaluation & Machine Learning, ; Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Epidemiology Unit, Department of Innovation and Science, , Isala Hospital, ; Zwolle, the Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-8139
                Article
                2948
                10.1186/s12883-022-02948-z
                9652934
                36371162
                66941062-147d-4b7c-8a34-40d698d822cc
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 1 September 2022
                : 28 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: National Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (NL)
                Award ID: OZ2020-001
                Funded by: Innovatie en wetenschapsfonds Isala
                Award ID: 20.015
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Neurology
                multiple sclerosis,msmonitor,quality of life,msmonitor-plus
                Neurology
                multiple sclerosis, msmonitor, quality of life, msmonitor-plus

                Comments

                Comment on this article