11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Exposure to Road, Railway, and Aircraft Noise and Arterial Stiffness in the SAPALDIA Study: Annual Average Noise Levels and Temporal Noise Characteristics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The impact of different transportation noise sources and noise environments on arterial stiffness remains unknown.

          Objectives:

          We evaluated the association between residential outdoor exposure to annual average road, railway, and aircraft noise levels, total noise intermittency (IR), and total number of noise events (NE) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) following a cross-sectional design.

          Methods:

          We measured baPWV (meters/second) in 2,775 participants (49–81 y old) at the second follow-up (2010–2011) of the Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA). We assigned annual average road, railway, and aircraft noise levels ( Lden source ), total day- and nighttime NE time and IR time ( percent fluctuation = 0 % , none or constant noise; percent fluctuation = 100 % , high fluctuation) at the most exposed façade using 2011 Swiss noise models. We applied multivariable linear mixed regression models to analyze associations.

          Results:

          Medians [interquartile ranges (IQRs)] were baPWV = 13.4 (3.1) m/s; Lden air ( 57.6 % exposed ) = 32.8 (8.0) dB; Lden rail ( 44.6 % exposed ) = 30.0 (8.1) dB; Lden road (99.7% exposed): 54.2 (10.6) dB; NE night = 123 (179); NE day = 433 (870); IR night = 73 % (27); and IR day = 63.8 % (40.3). We observed a 0.87% (95% CI: 0.31, 1.43%) increase in baPWV per IQR of Lden rail , which was greater with IR night > 80 % or with daytime sleepiness. We observed a nonsignificant positive association between Lden road and baPWV in urban areas and a negative tendency in rural areas. NE night , but not NE day , was associated with baPWV. Associations were independent of the other noise sources and air pollution.

          Conclusions:

          Long-term exposure to railway noise, particularly in an intermittent nighttime noise environment, and to nighttime noise events, mainly related to road noise, may affect arterial stiffness, a major determinant of cardiovascular disease. Ascertaining noise exposure characteristics beyond average noise levels may be relevant to better understand noise-related health effects. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1136

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure

          The role of noise as an environmental pollutant and its impact on health are being increasingly recognized. Beyond its effects on the auditory system, noise causes annoyance and disturbs sleep, and it impairs cognitive performance. Furthermore, evidence from epidemiologic studies demonstrates that environmental noise is associated with an increased incidence of arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Both observational and experimental studies indicate that in particular night-time noise can cause disruptions of sleep structure, vegetative arousals (e.g. increases of blood pressure and heart rate) and increases in stress hormone levels and oxidative stress, which in turn may result in endothelial dysfunction and arterial hypertension. This review focuses on the cardiovascular consequences of environmental noise exposure and stresses the importance of noise mitigation strategies for public health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis.

            Reviews have suggested that road noise exposure is associated with high blood pressure (hypertension). No reliable exposure-response relationship is as yet available. A meta-analysis was carried out in order to derive a quantitative exposure-response relationship between the exposure to road traffic noise and the prevalence of hypertension, and to gain some insight into the sources of heterogeneity among study results. Twenty-seven observational studies published between 1970 and 2010 in English, German or Dutch, were evaluated. Finally, the results of 24 studies were included into the data aggregation. Road traffic noise was positively and significantly associated with hypertension: Data aggregation revealed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.034 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.011-1.056] per 5 dB(A) increase of the 16 h average road traffic noise level (LAeq16hr) [range 45-75 dB(A)]. Important sources of heterogeneity were the age and sex of the population under study, the way exposure was ascertained, and the noise reference level used. Also the way noise was treated in the statistical model and the minimum years of residence of the population under study, gave an explanation of the observed heterogeneity. No definite conclusions can be drawn about the threshold value for the relationship between road traffic noise and the prevalence of hypertension. Based on the meta-analysis, a quantitative relationship is derived that can be used for health impact assessment. The results of this meta-analysis are consistent with a slight increase of cardiovascular disease risk in populations exposed to transportation noise.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Effect of nighttime aircraft noise exposure on endothelial function and stress hormone release in healthy adults

              Aims Aircraft noise disturbs sleep, and long-term exposure has been shown to be associated with increases in the prevalence of hypertension and an overall increased risk for myocardial infarction. The exact mechanisms responsible for these cardiovascular effects remain unclear. Methods and results We performed a blinded field study in 75 healthy volunteers (mean age 26 years), who were exposed at home, in random order, to one control pattern (no noise) and two different noise scenarios [30 or 60 aircraft noise events per night with an average maximum sound pressure level (SPL) of 60 dB(A)] for one night each. We performed polygraphy during each study night. Noise caused a worsening in sleep quality (P < 0.0001). Noise60, corresponding to equivalent continuous SPLs of 46.3 dB (Leq) and representing environmental noise levels associated with increased cardiovascular events, caused a blunting in FMD (P = 0.016). As well, although a direct comparison among the FMD values in the noise groups (control: 10.4 ± 3.8%; Noise30: 9.7 ± 4.1%; Noise60: 9.5 ± 4.3%, P = 0.052) did not reach significance, a monotone dose-dependent effect of noise level on FMD was shown (P = 0.020). Finally, there was a priming effect of noise, i.e. the blunting in FMD was particularly evident when subjects were exposed first to 30 and then to 60 noise events (P = 0.006). Noise-induced endothelial dysfunction (ED) was reversed by the administration of Vitamin C (P = 0.0171). Morning adrenaline concentration increased from 28.3 ± 10.9 to 33.2 ± 16.6 and 34.1 ± 19.3 ng/L (P = 0.0099). Pulse transit time, reflecting arterial stiffness, was also shorter after exposure to noise (P = 0.003). Conclusion In healthy adults, acute nighttime aircraft noise exposure dose-dependently impairs endothelial function and stimulates adrenaline release. Noise-induced ED may be in part due to increased production in reactive oxygen species and may thus be one mechanism contributing to the observed association of chronic noise exposure with cardiovascular disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                07 September 2017
                September 2017
                : 125
                : 9
                : 097004
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute , Basel, Switzerland
                [ 2 ]University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland
                [ 3 ]Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland
                [ 4 ]Center for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland
                [ 5 ]Empa, Laboratory for Acoustics/Noise Control, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology , Dübendorf, Switzerland
                [ 6 ] Federal Office for the Environment , Bern, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to M. Foraster, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; Telephone: 41 61 284 86 84. Email: maria.foraster@ 123456unibas.ch
                Article
                EHP1136
                10.1289/EHP1136
                5915209
                28934719
                664ac4e2-adc0-4d5b-8073-4e76bb7156f0

                EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.

                History
                : 23 September 2016
                : 20 March 2017
                : 31 March 2017
                Categories
                Research

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article