12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Giant intravesical prostatic protrusion mimicking bladder carcinoma: Navigating diagnostic and management challenges

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction and importance

          Benign prostate hyperplasia is common condition among elderly men, but giant intravesical prostatic protrusion is rare and may be confused with bladder carcinoma.

          Case presentation

          We report an unusual case of giant intravesical prostatic protrusion mimicking bladder carcinoma. A diagnosis of giant intravesical prostatic protrusion was confirmed with the assistance of cystoscopy and patient was managed by transvesical simple open prostatectomy where he had uneventfully recovery.

          Clinical discussion

          Both bladder carcinoma and benign prostate hyperplasia are more prevalent in elderly men and they all present with lower urinary tract symptoms. Ultrasound and computer tomography may all suggest bladder carcinoma. The two conditions are treated differently, and therefore having correct diagnosis is mandatory. Cystoscopy is an important investigation that can act as a tiebreaker in differentiating giant intravesical prostatic protrusion from bladder carcinoma. Transvesical simple open prostatectomy is the preferred surgical approach with good postoperative outcome.

          Conclusion

          This case report reminds urology surgeons on the possibility of having giant intravesical prostate mimicking bladder carcinoma and the importance of cystoscopy in differentiating the two. Transvesical simple open prostatectomy has promising result.

          Highlights

          • Benign prostate enlargement is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms among elderly men.

          • Large intravesical prostatic protrusion is a rare condition, mimicking bladder tumour.

          • Cystoscopy plays an important role in differentiating IPP from bladder tumour.

          • Transvesical simple open prostatectomy for large intravesical prostatic protrusion and has good post operative results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines

          The Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines were first published in 2016 as a tool for surgeons to document and report their surgical cases in a standardised and comprehensive manner. However, with advances in technology and changes in the healthcare landscape, it is important to revise and update these guidelines to ensure they remain relevant and valuable for surgeons. Materials and methods: The updated guidelines were produced through a Delphi consensus exercise. Members of the SCARE 2020 guidelines Delphi group, editorial board members, and peer reviewers were invited to participate. Potential contributors were contacted by e-mail. An online survey was completed to indicate their agreement with the proposed changes to the guideline items. Results: A total of 54 participants were invited to participate and 44 (81.5%) completed the survey. There was a high degree of agreement among reviewers, with 36 items (83.7%) meeting the threshold for inclusion. Conclusion: Through a completed Delphi consensus exercise we present the SCARE 2023 guidelines. This will provide surgeons with a comprehensive and up-to-date tool for documenting and reporting their surgical cases while highlighting the importance of patient-centred care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA Guideline

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical Considerations for Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion in the Evaluation and Management of Bladder Outlet Obstruction Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

              Background Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) is a manifestation of benign prostatic hyperplasia marked by overgrowth of the prostatic median lobe into the bladder, producing bladder outlet obstruction and related storage and voiding symptoms. Methods A MEDLINE® database search of the current literature was guided using combination of “prostate” with the following terms: intravesical prostatic protrusion, bladder trabeculation, bladder outlet obstruction, lower urinary tract symptoms, alpha blockers, transrectal ultrasonography, and prostatectomy. Results Although IPP can be identified via a variety of imaging modalities, it is easily detected via transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Failing to detect IPP promptly by TRUS may result in refractory symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, as the condition may not respond to typical α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist therapy. In addition, depending on grade, IPP can influence outcomes and complications of prostatectomies. Conclusion Upon report of lower urinary tract symptoms, initial performance of TRUS along with digital rectal examination prevents delay in the appropriate evaluation and management of prostatic diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Surg Case Rep
                Int J Surg Case Rep
                International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2210-2612
                27 March 2024
                May 2024
                27 March 2024
                : 118
                : 109590
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculty of medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian medical university college, P. O. Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania
                [b ]Department of urology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, P. O. Box 3010, Moshi, Tanzania
                [c ]Department of pathology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, P. O. Box 3010, Moshi, Tanzania
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Faculty of Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, P. O. Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania. baltonnic@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                S2210-2612(24)00371-7 109590
                10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109590
                11004631
                38581945
                65aa416d-aeef-4589-8792-ec1805b88db6
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 February 2024
                : 19 March 2024
                : 22 March 2024
                Categories
                Case Report

                ipp,bph,bladder carcinoma
                ipp, bph, bladder carcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content423

                Most referenced authors96