107
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Competition and constraint drove Cope's rule in the evolution of giant flying reptiles

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The pterosaurs, Mesozoic flying reptiles, attained wingspans of more than 10 m that greatly exceed the largest birds and challenge our understanding of size limits in flying animals. Pterosaurs have been used to illustrate Cope’s rule, the influential generalization that evolutionary lineages trend to increasingly large body sizes. However, unambiguous examples of Cope’s rule operating on extended timescales in large clades remain elusive, and the phylogenetic pattern and possible drivers of pterosaur gigantism are uncertain. Here we show 70 million years of highly constrained early evolution, followed by almost 80 million years of sustained, multi-lineage body size increases in pterosaurs. These results are supported by maximum-likelihood modelling of a comprehensive new pterosaur data set. The transition between these macroevolutionary regimes is coincident with the Early Cretaceous adaptive radiation of birds, supporting controversial hypotheses of bird–pterosaur competition, and suggesting that evolutionary competition can act as a macroevolutionary driver on extended geological timescales.

          Abstract

          Pterosaurs were Mesozoic flying reptiles with extremely large body sizes. Here, Benson et al. demonstrate that pterosaurs evolved increasing body sizes during the Cretaceous, at the same time of bird radiation, suggesting that competition can drive macroevolution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species.

            Many large animal species have a high risk of extinction. This is usually thought to result simply from the way that species traits associated with vulnerability, such as low reproductive rates, scale with body size. In a broad-scale analysis of extinction risk in mammals, we find two additional patterns in the size selectivity of extinction risk. First, impacts of both intrinsic and environmental factors increase sharply above a threshold body mass around 3 kilograms. Second, whereas extinction risk in smaller species is driven by environmental factors, in larger species it is driven by a combination of environmental factors and intrinsic traits. Thus, the disadvantages of large size are greater than generally recognized, and future loss of large mammal biodiversity could be far more rapid than expected.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Further analysts of the data by akaike' s information criterion and the finite corrections

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Pub. Group
                2041-1723
                02 April 2014
                : 5
                : 3567
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3AN, UK
                [2 ]Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
                [3 ]Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment and Department of Earth Sciences, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [4 ]School of Geosciences, University of South Florida , Tampa, Florida 33620, USA
                [5 ]School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                ncomms4567
                10.1038/ncomms4567
                3988819
                24694584
                62e30e75-28ae-4a56-8605-b9262c884a23
                Copyright © 2014, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History
                : 19 November 2013
                : 05 March 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article