22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A conceptual model to assess stress‐associated health effects of multiple ecosystem services degraded by disaster events in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Few conceptual frameworks attempt to connect disaster‐associated environmental injuries to impacts on ecosystem services (the benefits humans derive from nature) and thence to both psychological and physiological human health effects. To our knowledge, this study is one of the first, if not the first, to develop a detailed conceptual model of how degraded ecosystem services affect cumulative stress impacts on the health of individual humans and communities. Our comprehensive Disaster‐Pressure State‐Ecosystem Services‐Response‐Health model demonstrates that oil spills, hurricanes, and other disasters can change key ecosystem components resulting in reductions in individual and multiple ecosystem services that support people's livelihoods, health, and way of life. Further, the model elucidates how damage to ecosystem services produces acute, chronic, and cumulative stress in humans which increases risk of adverse psychological and physiological health outcomes. While developed and initially applied within the context of the Gulf of Mexico, it should work equally well in other geographies and for many disasters that cause impairment of ecosystem services. Use of this new tool will improve planning for responses to future disasters and help society more fully account for the costs and benefits of potential management responses. The model also can be used to help direct investments in improving response capabilities of the public health community, biomedical researchers, and environmental scientists. Finally, the model illustrates why the broad range of potential human health effects of disasters should receive equal attention to that accorded environmental damages in assessing restoration and recovery costs and time frames.

          Key Points

          • We present a Disaster‐Pressure State‐Ecosystem Services‐Response‐Health framework linking disaster‐degraded ecosystem services to health

          • Damaged ecosystem services produce acute, chronic, and cumulative stress that are associated with adverse health outcomes in humans

          • Disaster‐related health effects deserve more attention in planning for future disasters and improving response and restoration efforts

          Related collections

          Most cited references146

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants

          Stressors have a major influence upon mood, our sense of well-being, behavior, and health. Acute stress responses in young, healthy individuals may be adaptive and typically do not impose a health burden. However, if the threat is unremitting, particularly in older or unhealthy individuals, the long-term effects of stressors can damage health. The relationship between psychosocial stressors and disease is affected by the nature, number, and persistence of the stressors as well as by the individual's biological vulnerability (i.e., genetics, constitutional factors), psychosocial resources, and learned patterns of coping. Psychosocial interventions have proven useful for treating stress-related disorders and may influence the course of chronic diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease.

            This article presents a new formulation of the relationship between stress and the processes leading to disease. It emphasizes the hidden cost of chronic stress to the body over long time periods, which act as a predisposing factor for the effects of acute, stressful life events. It also presents a model showing how individual differences in the susceptibility to stress are tied to individual behavioral responses to environmental challenges that are coupled to physiologic and pathophysiologic responses. Published original articles from human and animal studies and selected reviews. Literature was surveyed using MEDLINE. Independent extraction and cross-referencing by us. Stress is frequently seen as a significant contributor to disease, and clinical evidence is mounting for specific effects of stress on immune and cardiovascular systems. Yet, until recently, aspects of stress that precipitate disease have been obscure. The concept of homeostasis has failed to help us understand the hidden toll of chronic stress on the body. Rather than maintaining constancy, the physiologic systems within the body fluctuate to meet demands from external forces, a state termed allostasis. In this article, we extend the concept of allostasis over the dimension of time and we define allostatic load as the cost of chronic exposure to fluctuating or heightened neural or neuroendocrine response resulting from repeated or chronic environmental challenge that an individual reacts to as being particularly stressful. This new formulation emphasizes the cascading relationships, beginning early in life, between environmental factors and genetic predispositions that lead to large individual differences in susceptibility to stress and, in some cases, to disease. There are now empirical studies based on this formulation, as well as new insights into mechanisms involving specific changes in neural, neuroendocrine, and immune systems. The practical implications of this formulation for clinical practice and further research are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Post-traumatic stress disorder following disasters: a systematic review.

              Disasters are traumatic events that may result in a wide range of mental and physical health consequences. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is probably the most commonly studied post-disaster psychiatric disorder. This review aimed to systematically assess the evidence about PTSD following exposure to disasters. MethodA systematic search was performed. Eligible studies for this review included reports based on the DSM criteria of PTSD symptoms. The time-frame for inclusion of reports in this review is from 1980 (when PTSD was first introduced in DSM-III) and February 2007 when the literature search for this examination was terminated. We identified 284 reports of PTSD following disasters published in peer-reviewed journals since 1980. We categorized them according to the following classification: (1) human-made disasters (n=90), (2) technological disasters (n=65), and (3) natural disasters (n=116). Since some studies reported on findings from mixed samples (e.g. survivors of flooding and chemical contamination) we grouped these studies together (n=13). The body of research conducted after disasters in the past three decades suggests that the burden of PTSD among persons exposed to disasters is substantial. Post-disaster PTSD is associated with a range of correlates including sociodemographic and background factors, event exposure characteristics, social support factors and personality traits. Relatively few studies have employed longitudinal assessments enabling documentation of the course of PTSD. Methodological limitations and future directions for research in this field are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sandiferpa@cofc.edu
                Journal
                Geohealth
                Geohealth
                10.1002/(ISSN)2471-1403
                GH2
                GeoHealth
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2471-1403
                21 March 2017
                March 2017
                : 1
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/gh2.v1.1 )
                : 17-36
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Sciences and Mathematics College of Charleston Charleston South Carolina USA
                [ 2 ] Master's in Environmental Studies College of Charleston Charleston South Carolina USA
                [ 3 ] Private Bainbridge Island Washington USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Environmental Health Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Psychiatry Columbia University New York New York USA
                [ 6 ] Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory NOAA Miami Florida USA
                [ 7 ] Epidemiology Branch National Institute of Environmental Health Science Research Triangle Park North Carolina USA
                [ 8 ] Department of Children, Youth and Families University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
                [ 9 ] Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze Florida USA
                [ 10 ] Department of Landscape Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Champaign Illinois USA
                [ 11 ] Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center University of Maryland and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: P. A. Sandifer

                sandiferpa@ 123456cofc.edu

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1255-1470
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8474-3239
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1242-7728
                Article
                GH218 2016GH000038
                10.1002/2016GH000038
                6309401
                30596189
                625adbbc-ced1-4205-bb62-5e417a621c82
                ©2017. The Authors.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 05 December 2016
                : 23 February 2017
                : 23 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 20, Words: 8491
                Funding
                Funded by: National Academy of Sciences Gulf Research Program
                Award ID: 2000005981
                Funded by: Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100007240;
                Funded by: Intramural Research Program
                Award ID: NA14NES4320003
                Funded by: NOAA , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000192;
                Categories
                Global Change
                Sea Level Change
                Atmospheric Processes
                Ocean/Atmosphere Interactions
                Natural Hazards
                Health Impact
                Disaster Management
                Disaster Policy
                Oceanic
                Atmospheric
                Oceanography: Physical
                Tsunamis and Storm Surges
                Policy Sciences
                Public Issues
                Science Policy
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.4 mode:remove_FC converted:09.01.2020

                conceptual model,environmental disasters,ecosystem services,human health,stress and health problems,gulf of mexico

                Comments

                Comment on this article