10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      We invite you to submit your manuscript to APA's open access journal, Technology, Mind, and Behavior.

      Learn more and submit.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Literature Review on the Effects of Exergames on Executive Function in Youth

      article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Exergames (video games that promote cognitive and physical activity simultaneously) benefit executive function (EF) in elderly populations. It has been suggested that exergames may induce larger effects than cognitive or exercise training alone, but few reviews have synthesized the causal factors of exergames on EF from experimental research with youth. This review investigates (a) the various types of exergames and associated comparison conditions; (b) the EF outcome assessments commonly utilized in exergame research with youth; (c) the efficacy of exergames by evaluating experimental studies that compared exergaming to cognitive, exercise, and passive control conditions inclusive of effect sizes; and (d) the potential mechanisms underlying the changes in EF induced from exergames. Eligible outcome data were available from 607 participants across 10 studies, with the age of participants ranging from 4 to 21 ( M age = 10.46). The findings indicate that exergames improve aspects of EF from both acute and chronic studies. Despite the high variability of exergame contexts, dosages, populations, and outcome assessments, improvements in EF comparing exergaming to passive control conditions were exhibited across all studies. While there is evidence of exergaming demonstrating advantages over passive control conditions, evidence is mixed when comparing exergaming to sedentary cognitive and exercise comparison conditions. Potential sources of these mixed results and future directions to address current gaps in the field are identified. As video game and technology use grows exponentially and concerns of childhood sedentary behavior and play deprivation increase, evidence-based practices that promote both physical and cognitive activity are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Executive Functions

          Executive functions (EFs) make possible mentally playing with ideas; taking the time to think before acting; meeting novel, unanticipated challenges; resisting temptations; and staying focused. Core EFs are inhibition [response inhibition (self-control—resisting temptations and resisting acting impulsively) and interference control (selective attention and cognitive inhibition)], working memory, and cognitive flexibility (including creatively thinking “outside the box,” seeing anything from different perspectives, and quickly and flexibly adapting to changed circumstances). The developmental progression and representative measures of each are discussed. Controversies are addressed (e.g., the relation between EFs and fluid intelligence, self-regulation, executive attention, and effortful control, and the relation between working memory and inhibition and attention). The importance of social, emotional, and physical health for cognitive health is discussed because stress, lack of sleep, loneliness, or lack of exercise each impair EFs. That EFs are trainable and can be improved with practice is addressed, including diverse methods tried thus far.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

              This individual differences study examined the separability of three often postulated executive functions-mental set shifting ("Shifting"), information updating and monitoring ("Updating"), and inhibition of prepotent responses ("Inhibition")-and their roles in complex "frontal lobe" or "executive" tasks. One hundred thirty-seven college students performed a set of relatively simple experimental tasks that are considered to predominantly tap each target executive function as well as a set of frequently used executive tasks: the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Tower of Hanoi (TOH), random number generation (RNG), operation span, and dual tasking. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the three target executive functions are moderately correlated with one another, but are clearly separable. Moreover, structural equation modeling suggested that the three functions contribute differentially to performance on complex executive tasks. Specifically, WCST performance was related most strongly to Shifting, TOH to Inhibition, RNG to Inhibition and Updating, and operation span to Updating. Dual task performance was not related to any of the three target functions. These results suggest that it is important to recognize both the unity and diversity of executive functions and that latent variable analysis is a useful approach to studying the organization and roles of executive functions. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Technology, Mind, and Behavior
                American Psychological Association
                2689-0208
                September 25, 2023
                : 4
                : 3
                : np
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences of Stanford Medicine, Stanford University
                [2]Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University
                [3]Department of Child and Adolescent Development, San Francisco State University
                Author notes
                Action Editor: C. Shawn Green was the action editor for this article.
                Acknowledgments: The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the National Institutes of Health or the U.S. Department of Education. The funding agencies played no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the article. The authors thank Marissa McAfee, Olivia Brand, Camila Bodden, Kristy Zhang, and Maanasi Bulusu for assistance in coding.
                Funding: This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (Grant T32MH019908; Allan Reiss, MD, principal investigator [funding Cassondra M. Eng]) and in part by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305B150008 to Carnegie Mellon University (awarded to Cassondra M. Eng).
                Disclosures: The authors declare no real or potential conflicts of interest, including financial, personal, or other relationships with other organizations or companies that may inappropriately impact or influence the research and interpretation of the findings.
                Data Availability: This article is a literature review designed to help develop, use, and assess the impact of exergames on executive function; thus, the descriptive statistics, analytic methods, and experimental materials of the studies included in the review are available to other researchers directly from the original articles. Partial η 2 was the most reported effect size across studies and was reported in this review as it was in the original articles. For consistency and interpretability, the one study that reported Cohen’s d as effect sizes were converted to partial η 2, and the one study that did not report effect sizes were computed by first calculating Cohen’s d and then subsequently converted to partial η 2. All equations and the values used to compute effect sizes are reported in the review in the Executive Function Outcome Measures: Effect Sizes section and in Table 2.
                [*] Cassondra M. Eng, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences of Stanford Medicine, Stanford University, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94304, United States cassie24@stanford.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9825-8864
                Article
                tmb 2024-12037-001
                10.1037/tmb0000118
                620d08cb-2866-438b-a761-c7b8ea952df7
                © 2023 The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.

                History

                Education,Psychology,Vocational technology,Engineering,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                executive function,experimental research,exergames,literature review,youth

                Comments

                Comment on this article