11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What makes cities livable? Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness in different contexts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Shaping livable cities is an enduring issue for urban planning, which came dramatically to the forefront of relevant policies with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study explores what makes cities livable by using neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness as measures of urban livability. The determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness are examined and compared, using geospatial and survey data from two cities, one from the South and the other from the North European context: Thessaloniki, Greece and Oslo, Norway. A structural equation model is developed and tested. In both cities, common determinants of neighborhood satisfaction are found to be the proximity to city center, neighborhood perceived safety, and place attachment, whereas common determinants of neighborhood happiness are found to be neighborhood perceived safety, neighborhood perceived quietness, neighborhood social cohesion, place attachment, and lower neighborhood density. Important differences between the two cities were also observed. Numerous local amenities seem to positively contribute to urban livability in Thessaloniki, but not in Oslo. Parks and trees are positively linked to neighborhood happiness in Oslo, but not in Thessaloniki. These differences support the view that some of the links between neighborhood characteristics and livability depend on the local context related to local culture, attitudes, and preferences, all of which might also be influenced by the local built environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.

            Quantification of global forest change has been lacking despite the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services. In this study, Earth observation satellite data were used to map global forest loss (2.3 million square kilometers) and gain (0.8 million square kilometers) from 2000 to 2012 at a spatial resolution of 30 meters. The tropics were the only climate domain to exhibit a trend, with forest loss increasing by 2101 square kilometers per year. Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation was offset by increasing forest loss in Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Bolivia, Zambia, Angola, and elsewhere. Intensive forestry practiced within subtropical forests resulted in the highest rates of forest change globally. Boreal forest loss due largely to fire and forestry was second to that in the tropics in absolute and proportional terms. These results depict a globally consistent and locally relevant record of forest change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

              Hypotheses involving mediation are common in the behavioral sciences. Mediation exists when a predictor affects a dependent variable indirectly through at least one intervening variable, or mediator. Methods to assess mediation involving multiple simultaneous mediators have received little attention in the methodological literature despite a clear need. We provide an overview of simple and multiple mediation and explore three approaches that can be used to investigate indirect processes, as well as methods for contrasting two or more mediators within a single model. We present an illustrative example, assessing and contrasting potential mediators of the relationship between the helpfulness of socialization agents and job satisfaction. We also provide SAS and SPSS macros, as well as Mplus and LISREL syntax, to facilitate the use of these methods in applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Land use policy
                Land use policy
                Land Use Policy
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0264-8377
                1873-5754
                11 November 2021
                January 2022
                11 November 2021
                : 112
                : 105855
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway
                [b ]School of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Norwegian University of Life Sciences,Norway.
                Article
                S0264-8377(21)00578-0 105855
                10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105855
                9756041
                36540631
                610db763-d0fc-4f5f-a650-e361e6d4d827
                © 2021 The Authors

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 1 April 2021
                : 9 October 2021
                : 31 October 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Social policy & Welfare
                livable cities,subjective well-being,social sustainability,built environment,residential satisfaction,urban quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article