9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To analyse the current evidence for the management of lupus nephritis (LN) informing the 2019 update of the EULAR/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association recommendations.

          Methods

          According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a PubMed systematic literature review was performed, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. Since this was an update of the 2012 recommendations, the final level of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendations considered the total body of evidence, including literature prior to 2012.

          Results

          We identified 387 relevant articles. High-quality randomised evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for class III and class IV LN (LoE 1a), and moderate-level evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria (LoE 2b). Treatment should aim for at least 25% reduction in proteinuria at 3 months, 50% at 6 months and complete renal response (<500–700 mg/day) at 12 months (LoE 2a-2b). High-quality evidence supports the use of mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (MMF/MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) as initial treatment of active class III/IV LN (LoE 1a). Combination of tacrolimus with MMF/MPA and high-dose CY are alternatives in specific circumstances (LoE 1a). There is low-quality level evidence to guide optimal duration of immunosuppression in LN (LoE 3). In end-stage kidney disease, all methods of kidney replacement treatment can be used, with transplantation having the most favourable outcomes (LoE 2b).

          Conclusions

          There is high-quality evidence to guide the initial and subsequent phases of class III/IV LN treatment, but low-to-moderate quality evidence to guide treatment of class V LN, monitoring and optimal duration of immunosuppression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references100

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA–EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis

          Objective To update the 2012 EULAR/ERA–EDTA recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis (LN). Methods Following the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was performed. Members of a multidisciplinary Task Force voted independently on their level of agreeement with the formed statements. Results The changes include recommendations for treatment targets, use of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and management of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The target of therapy is complete response (proteinuria <0.5–0.7 g/24 hours with (near-)normal glomerular filtration rate) by 12 months, but this can be extended in patients with baseline nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended with regular ophthalmological monitoring. In active proliferative LN, initial (induction) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF 2–3 g/day or mycophenolic acid (MPA) at equivalent dose) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY; 500 mg × 6 biweekly doses), both combined with glucocorticoids (pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisone 0.3–0.5 mg/kg/day) is recommended. MMF/CNI (especially tacrolimus) combination and high-dose CY are alternatives, for patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent long-term maintenance treatment with MMF or azathioprine should follow, with no or low-dose (<7.5 mg/day) glucocorticoids. The choice of agent depends on the initial regimen and plans for pregnancy. In non-responding disease, switch of induction regimens or rituximab are recommended. In pure membranous LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria or proteinuria >1 g/24 hours despite renin–angiotensin–aldosterone blockade, MMF in combination with glucocorticoids is preferred. Assessment for kidney and extra-renal disease activity, and management of comorbidities is lifelong with repeat kidney biopsy in cases of incomplete response or nephritic flares. In ESKD, transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement option with immunosuppression guided by transplant protocols and/or extra-renal manifestations. Treatment of LN in children follows the same principles as adult disease. Conclusions We have updated the EULAR recommendations for the management of LN to facilitate homogenization of patient care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multitarget therapy for induction treatment of lupus nephritis: a randomized trial.

            Treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) remains challenging.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and safety of abatacept in lupus nephritis: a twelve-month, randomized, double-blind study.

              To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) abatacept, a selective T cell costimulation modulator, versus placebo for the treatment of active class III or IV lupus nephritis, when used on a background of mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                RMD Open
                RMD Open
                rmdopen
                rmdopen
                RMD Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2056-5933
                2020
                21 July 2020
                : 6
                : 2
                : e001263
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Nephrology, “G. Gennimatas” General Hospital , Athens, Greece
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Unit, “Laikon” Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School , Athens, Greece
                [3 ] departmentRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital Attikon , Athens, Greece
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Rheumatology, “Asklepieion” General Hospital , Athens, Greece
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge University , Cambridge, UK
                [6 ] departmentRheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital of Heraklion , Heraklion, Greece
                [7 ] departmentLaboratory of Autoimmunity and Inflammation, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens , Athens, Greece
                [8 ] departmentJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Medical School, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, and Medical School, University of Cyprus , Nicosia, Cyprus
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dimitrios Boumpas; boumpasd@ 123456uoc.gr

                MK and AF contributed equally

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-031X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-4671
                Article
                rmdopen-2020-001263
                10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001263
                7425195
                32699043
                5f776254-6884-4aed-89f8-b93b419d2eba
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 April 2020
                : 08 May 2020
                : 22 May 2020
                Categories
                Lupus
                2430
                Original research

                lupus erythematosus,systemic,lupus nephritis,therapeutics

                Comments

                Comment on this article