50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Moderating Influence of Demographic Characteristics, Social Support, and Religious Coping on the Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Psychosocial Caregiver Intervention in Three Racial Ethnic Groups

      , ,
      The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article extends the findings from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH II) program, a multisite randomized clinical trial of a multicomponent psychosocial intervention, to improve the well-being of informal caregivers (CGs) of persons with dementia. We used residual change scores and stepwise hierarchical regression analyses to explore separately in 3 racial ethnic groups (Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, and White or Caucasian) how the effects of the intervention were moderated by CG characteristics (sex, age, education, and relationship), CG resources (social support), and religious coping. The results indicated that CG's age and religious coping moderated the effects of the intervention for Hispanics and Blacks. The older Hispanic and Black CGs who received the intervention reported a decrease in CG burden from baseline to follow-up. Black CGs with less religious coping who received the intervention also reported a decrease in depressive symptoms from baseline to follow-up.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ethnic differences in stressors, resources, and psychological outcomes of family caregiving: a meta-analysis.

          We investigated ethnic differences in caregiver background variables, objective stressors, filial obligations beliefs, psychological and social resources, coping processes, and psychological and physical health. We used a meta-analysis to integrate the results of 116 empirical studies. Ethnic minority caregivers had a lower socioeconomic status, were younger, were less likely to be a spouse, and more likely to receive informal support. They provided more care than White caregivers and had stronger filial obligations beliefs than White caregivers. Asian-American caregivers, but not African-American and Hispanic caregivers, used less formal support than non-Hispanic White caregivers. Whereas African-American caregivers had lower levels of caregiver burden and depression than White caregivers, we found that Hispanic and Asian-American caregivers were more depressed than their White non-Hispanic peers. However, all groups of ethnic minority caregivers reported worse physical health than Whites. Observed ethnic differences in burden and depression were influenced by study characteristics, such as the type of illness of the care recipient and the representativeness of the sample. The results suggest that more specific theories are needed to explain differential effects of ethnic minority groups of caregivers. Intervention needs vary, in part, between ethnic groups of caregivers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Zarit Burden Interview

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Spousal caregivers of dementia victims: longitudinal changes in immunity and health.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
                The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1079-5014
                1758-5368
                February 15 2010
                March 01 2010
                January 07 2010
                March 01 2010
                : 65B
                : 2
                : 185-194
                Article
                10.1093/geronb/gbp131
                2821943
                20056684
                5ef03656-0ffd-47c7-8147-aa7bf38f1d5f
                © 2010
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,466

                Cited by18

                Most referenced authors351