5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experiences With Health Care Services in Switzerland Among Immigrant Women With Chronic Illnesses

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Descriptive data indicate a high burden of chronic illness among immigrant women in Switzerland. Little is known about how immigrant women with chronic illnesses experience healthcare services. This paper presents a methodological approach theoretically informed by Sen's capability approach and Levesque's framework of access to healthcare to study patient-reported experiences (PREs) of Swiss healthcare services among immigrant women with chronic conditions.

          Methods: We conducted 48 semi-structured qualitative interviews in Bern and Geneva with Turkish ( n = 12), Portuguese ( n = 12), German ( n = 12), and Swiss ( n = 12) women. Participants were heterogenous in age, length of stay, SES, and educational attainment, illness types and history. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with healthcare and social service providers ( n = 12). Interviewed women participated in two focus group discussions ( n = 15). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Atlas.ti software, based on Gale et al.'s framework approach. Findings informed three stakeholder dialogues in which women as well as healthcare providers and policymakers from various territorial levels participated.

          Results: Our methodological approach succeeded in integrating women's perspectives—from initial data collection in interviews to identify issues, focus group discussions to increase rigor, and stakeholder dialogues to develop tailored recommendations based on PREs.

          Discussion: This is one of the first studies in Switzerland that used PREs to research healthcare services and healthcare needs among immigrant women with chronic illnesses. This paper provides new insights on how to better understand existing challenges and potentially improve access to and quality of care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

          Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations

              Background Access is central to the performance of health care systems around the world. However, access to health care remains a complex notion as exemplified in the variety of interpretations of the concept across authors. The aim of this paper is to suggest a conceptualisation of access to health care describing broad dimensions and determinants that integrate demand and supply-side-factors and enabling the operationalisation of access to health care all along the process of obtaining care and benefiting from the services. Methods A synthesis of the published literature on the conceptualisation of access has been performed. The most cited frameworks served as a basis to develop a revised conceptual framework. Results Here, we view access as the opportunity to identify healthcare needs, to seek healthcare services, to reach, to obtain or use health care services, and to actually have a need for services fulfilled. We conceptualise five dimensions of accessibility: 1) Approachability; 2) Acceptability; 3) Availability and accommodation; 4) Affordability; 5) Appropriateness. In this framework, five corresponding abilities of populations interact with the dimensions of accessibility to generate access. Five corollary dimensions of abilities include: 1) Ability to perceive; 2) Ability to seek; 3) Ability to reach; 4) Ability to pay; and 5) Ability to engage. Conclusions This paper explains the comprehensiveness and dynamic nature of this conceptualisation of access to care and identifies relevant determinants that can have an impact on access from a multilevel perspective where factors related to health systems, institutions, organisations and providers are considered with factors at the individual, household, community, and population levels.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                16 October 2020
                2020
                : 8
                : 553438
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Sport Science, University of Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [2] 2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [3] 3School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Marmara University , Istanbul, Turkey
                [4] 4Institut de Recherches Sociologiques, Université de Genève , Geneva, Switzerland
                [5] 5School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Koç University , Istanbul, Turkey
                Author notes

                Edited by: Connie J. Evashwick, George Washington University, United States

                Reviewed by: Salma El Tayeb El Amin, University of Tampere, Finland; Lan Hoang Nguyen, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam

                *Correspondence: Thomas Abel thomas.abel@ 123456ispm.unibe.ch

                This article was submitted to Public Health Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2020.553438
                7608491
                33194954
                5e706f0e-b74f-4348-8a6a-e4f33045c306
                Copyright © 2020 Frahsa, Farquet, Bayram, De Araujo, Meyer, Sakarya, Cattacin and Abel.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 April 2020
                : 10 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 34, Pages: 11, Words: 7208
                Funding
                Funded by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10.13039/501100001711
                Award ID: NFP74
                Categories
                Public Health
                Brief Research Report

                chronic care,women,immigrant backgrounds,quality of care,access to care,policy transfer,participatory planning,pres

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content233

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors410