3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Crossmodal correspondences as common ground for joint action

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When performing joint actions, people rely on common ground – shared information that provides the required basis for mutual understanding. Common ground can be based on people's interaction history or on knowledge and expectations people share, e.g., because they belong to the same culture or social class. Here, we suggest that people rely on yet another form of common ground, one that originates in their similarities in multisensory processing. Specifically, we focus on ‘crossmodal correspondences’ – nonarbitrary associations that people make between stimulus features in different sensory modalities, e.g., between stimuli in the auditory and the visual modality such as high-pitched sounds and small objects. Going beyond previous research that focused on investigating crossmodal correspondences in individuals, we propose that people can use these correspondences for communicating and coordinating with others. Initial support for our proposal comes from a communication game played in a public space (an art gallery) by pairs of visitors. We observed that pairs created nonverbal communication systems by spontaneously relying on ‘crossmodal common ground’. Based on these results, we conclude that crossmodal correspondences not only occur within individuals but that they can also be actively used in joint action to facilitate the coordination between individuals.

          Highlights

          • Crossmodal correspondences naturally provide a form of common ground.

          • People employ this ‘crossmodal common ground’ for communication.

          • Crossmodal correspondences can thereby support joint action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review.

          In many everyday situations, our senses are bombarded by many different unisensory signals at any given time. To gain the most veridical, and least variable, estimate of environmental stimuli/properties, we need to combine the individual noisy unisensory perceptual estimates that refer to the same object, while keeping those estimates belonging to different objects or events separate. How, though, does the brain "know" which stimuli to combine? Traditionally, researchers interested in the crossmodal binding problem have focused on the roles that spatial and temporal factors play in modulating multisensory integration. However, crossmodal correspondences between various unisensory features (such as between auditory pitch and visual size) may provide yet another important means of constraining the crossmodal binding problem. A large body of research now shows that people exhibit consistent crossmodal correspondences between many stimulus features in different sensory modalities. For example, people consistently match high-pitched sounds with small, bright objects that are located high up in space. The literature reviewed here supports the view that crossmodal correspondences need to be considered alongside semantic and spatiotemporal congruency, among the key constraints that help our brains solve the crossmodal binding problem.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Joint action: bodies and minds moving together.

            The ability to coordinate our actions with those of others is crucial for our success as individuals and as a species. Progress in understanding the cognitive and neural processes involved in joint action has been slow and sparse, because cognitive neuroscientists have predominantly studied individual minds and brains in isolation. However, in recent years, major advances have been made by investigating perception and action in social context. In this article we outline how studies on joint attention, action observation, task sharing, action coordination and agency contribute to the understanding of the cognitive and neural processes supporting joint action. Several mechanisms are proposed that allow individuals to share representations, to predict actions, and to integrate predicted effects of own and others' actions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity.

              V Walsh (2003)
              Research into the perception of space, time and quantity has generated three separate literatures. That number can be represented spatially is, of course, well accepted and forms a basis for research into spatial aspects of numerical processing. Links between number and time or between space and time, on the other hand, are rarely discussed and the shared properties of all three systems have not been considered. I propose here that time, space and quantity are part of a generalized magnitude system. I outline A Theory Of Magnitude (ATOM) as a conceptually new framework within which to re-interpret the cortical processing of these elements of the environment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Acta Psychol (Amst)
                Acta Psychol (Amst)
                Acta Psychologica
                North Holland Publishing
                0001-6918
                1873-6297
                1 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 212
                : 103222
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
                [b ]Faculty of Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
                [c ]Munich Centre for Neuroscience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
                [d ]Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, UK
                [e ]Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                [f ]Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                [g ]Institute for Sports Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 4, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. cvesper@ 123456cc.au.dk
                Article
                S0001-6918(20)30546-1 103222
                10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103222
                7755874
                33302228
                5be32e0e-9932-4a68-8f04-4e14a59eedc3
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 February 2020
                : 25 September 2020
                : 5 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                joint action,communication,common ground,crossmodal correspondences,social cognition,multisensory perception

                Comments

                Comment on this article