4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To our knowledge, no studies exist on the influence of nomadic pastoralist women’s networks on their reproductive and sexual health (RSH), including uptake of modern family planning (FP).

          Methods

          Using name generator questions, we carried out qualitative egocentric social network analysis (SNA) to explore the networks of four women. Networks were analyzed in R, visuals created in Visone and a framework approach used for the qualitative data.

          Results

          Women named 10–12 individuals. Husbands were key in RSH decisions and never supported modern FP use. Women were unsure who supported their use of modern FP and we found evidence for a norm against it within their networks.

          Conclusions

          Egocentric SNA proves valuable to exploring RSH reference groups, particularly where there exists little prior research. Pastoralist women’s networks likely change as a result of migration and conflict; however, husbands make RSH decisions and mothers and female neighbors provide key support in broader RSH issues. Interventions to increase awareness of modern FP should engage with women’s wider networks.

          Plain language summary

          Few studies have asked nomadic women in Kenya to name the important individuals in their lives when it comes to making reproductive and sexual health decisions, including their use of family planning. These important individuals are described as a woman’s “network”. We used a survey and open-ended interview format to identify the individuals in four nomadic women’s networks (“social network analysis”). Data was analysed in R and we created a visual map of these networks. Women named 10–12 individuals. Women’s husbands made reproductive health decisions and did not approve of modern family planning use. Apart from their husbands, women did not know who in their network approved of their use of family planning. Female neighbors and mothers provided important support to women. Interventions to increase awareness of modern FP should engage with everyone in a woman’s network.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

          Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Core Discussion Networks of Americans

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Network Data and Measurement

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                l.j.kenny@lse.ac.uk
                hassanrahma2005@gmail.com
                Loraine.Bacchus@lshtm.ac.uk
                M.Smith3@napier.ac.uk
                bsd@uw.edu
                ndagadu@savechildren.org
                amuriuki@savechildren.org
                abdullahi.aden@savethechildren.org
                Jelle.Ibrahim@savethechildren.org
                Ben.Cislaghi@lshtm.ac.uk
                M.Hossain3@lse.ac.uk
                Journal
                Reprod Health
                Reprod Health
                Reproductive Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-4755
                26 May 2021
                26 May 2021
                2021
                : 18
                : 108
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8991.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, ; 15-17 Tavistock Place, Saint Pancras, London, WC1H 9SH UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.13063.37, ISNI 0000 0001 0789 5319, Present Address: Centre for Women, Peace & Security, , London School of Economics and Political Science, ; Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.10604.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2019 0495, Institute for Development Studies, , University of Nairobi, ; 4 Harry Thuku Rd, Nairobi, Kenya
                [4 ]GRID grid.20409.3f, ISNI 000000012348339X, The Business School, , Edinburgh Napier University, ; Edinburgh, EH14 1DJ UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.34477.33, ISNI 0000000122986657, Department of Anthropology, , University of Washington, ; 314 Denny Hall, Box 353100, Seattle, WA 98195-3100 USA
                [6 ]Save the Children US, 899 North Capitol St NE, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20002 USA
                [7 ]Save the Children Kenya, Matundu Close, Off School Lane, Westlands, P.O. Box 39664-00623, Nairobi, Kenya
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-1276
                Article
                1164
                10.1186/s12978-021-01164-1
                8157425
                34039368
                5b1a8019-afac-4acc-a655-76a09e31caca
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 14 August 2020
                : 20 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                social network,nomadic pastoralist,family planning,reproductive health,social norms

                Comments

                Comment on this article